Moral Constraints on War: Principles and Cases
Moral Constraints on War offers a principle-by-principle presentation of the transcultural roots of the ethics of war in an age defined by the increasingly international nature of military intervention. Parts one and two trace the evolution of Just War theory, analyzing the principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello: the principles that determine under what conditions a war may be started and then conducted. Each chapter provides the historical background of the principle under discussion, an explanation of the principle, and numerous historical examples of its application. In Part three, case studies apply the theories discussed to the Gulf War, the 1994 Russian intervention in Chechnya, NATO's humanitarian mission in Kosovo, and the U.S. military's actions in Afghanistan in the wake of the World Trade Center attacks. Bringing together an international coterie of philosophers and political scientists this accessible and practical guide offers students of military ethics, international law, and social conflict rich, up-to-the-minute insight into the pluralistic character of Just War Theory.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Jus and Bellum
Likelihood of Success
Jus in Bello
The First Chechen War 19941996
The NATO Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis MarchJune 1999
NATOs Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis Whose Justice?
After Kosovo Moral and Legal Constraints on Humanitarian Intervention
The Military Response of the USLed Coalition to the September 11 Attacks
About the Contributors
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted According actions aggression allies American apply armed army attack authority bombing campaign cause Chechen Chechnya civilian claim clear coalition concerning consequences considered constitutes countries decision defense Discrimination effect ethics fact fighting force France French further German human rights humanitarian humanitarian intervention intentions interests intervention involved issue justice justified killed Kosovo Last Legitimate Authority Likelihood of Success limited March means military moral movements NATO NATO's nature nuclear objectives operations organization parties peace policies political population position possible present Press Principle problem Proportionality question reason regime region relations resistance Resolution Resort respect response result Right Intentions rule Russian sanctions Security Council Serb situation sovereignty Soviet started Taliban territory Theory threat tion troops Union United United Nations University violations wars weapons World
Page 4 - You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I wilL War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it: and those who brought war into our Country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I will make more sacrifices today than any of you to Secure Peace. But you cannot have Peace and a Division of our Country.
Page 5 - You might as well appeal against the thunder-storm as against these terrible hardships of war. They are inevitable, and the only way the people of Atlanta can hope once more to live in peace and quiet at home, is to stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride.
Page 2 - In international society all forms of coercion are permissible, including wars of destruction. This means that the struggle for power is identical with the struggle for survival, and the improvement of the relative power position becomes the primary objective of the internal and the external policy of states.
References to this book
In War We Trust: The Bush Doctrine and the Pursuit of Just War
Chris J. Dolan
No preview available - 2005
All Book Search results »
War: Essays in Political Philosophy
No preview available - 2008