Page images
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]

?

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS

JAMIE L. WHITTEN, Mississippi, Chairman

EDWARD P. BOLAND, Massachusetts
WILLIAM H. NATCHER, Kentucky
NEAL SMITH, Iowa

SIDNEY R. YATES, Illinois
DAVID R. OBEY, Wisconsin
EDWARD R. ROYBAL, California
LOUIS STOKES, Ohio
TOM BEVILL, Alabama

BILL CHAPPELL, JR., Florida
BILL ALEXANDER, Arkansas

JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania
BOB TRAXLER, Michigan

JOSEPH D. EARLY, Massachusetts
CHARLES WILSON, Texas

LINDY (MRS. HALE) BOGGS, Louisiana
NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington
MATTHEW F. McHUGH, New York
WILLIAM LEHMAN, Florida

MARTIN OLAV SABO, Minnesota

JULIAN C. DIXON, California

VIC FAZIO, California

W. G. (BILL) HEFNER, North Carolina

LES AUCOIN, Oregon

DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii

WES WATKINS, Oklahoma

WILLIAM H. GRAY III, Pennsylvania

BERNARD J. DWYER, New Jersey

BILL BONER, Tennessee

STENY H. HOYER, Maryland

BOB CARR, Michigan

SILVIO O. CONTE, Massachusetts
JOSEPH M. McDADE, Pennsylvania
JOHN T. MYERS, Indiana
CLARENCE E. MILLER, Ohio
LAWRENCE COUGHLIN, Pennsylvania
C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida
JACK F. KEMP, New York
RALPH REGULA, Ohio
VIRGINIA SMITH, Nebraska
CARL D. PURSELL, Michigan
MICKEY EDWARDS, Oklahoma
BOB LIVINGSTON, Louisiana
BILL GREEN, New York
JERRY LEWIS, California

JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois
HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky
JOE SKEEN, New Mexico
FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia
BILL LOWERY, California
VIN WEBER, Minnesota
TOM DELAY, Texas

JIM KOLBE, Arizona

ROBERT J. MRAZEK, New York

RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois

RONALD D. COLEMAN, Texas

ALLAN B. MOLLOHAN, West Virginia

FREDERICK G. MOHRMAN, Clerk and Staff Director

DEPARTMENTS

OF LABOR, HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1988

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1987.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

WITNESSES

HON. OTIS R. BOWEN, M.D., SECRETARY, HHS

THOMAS K. BURKE, CHIEF OF STAFF, HHS

S. ANTHONY MCCANN, ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, HHS

RON DOCKSAI, ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR LEGISLATION

CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

Mr. NATCHER. The committee will come to order.

At this time we have before the committee the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Mr. Secretary, as you have heard me say before, many of us here in the Congress_consider your department to be the most important agency of our Federal Government.

The programs you administer affect virtually every family in this country. They provide income security for the elderly and disabled and health and social services for the poor. Research activities at the NIH provide the hope that we can one day cure and prevent the dread diseases of our time, like cancer-diseases like heart disease, schizophrenia, and acquired immune deficiency syndrome. This is an awesome responsibility.

Mr. Secretary, I want you to know that I believe the Department is in good hands under your leadership. Several months ago before the full Committee on Appropriations when we were presenting a matter pertaining to our subcommittee-I said to them, in the full committee, Mr. Secretary, that I believed that you would make an excellent secretary.

I said to them that you are a politician and a doctor and the right kind of a politician, and there is nothing wrong with that. I think the committee generally accepted what I said to them. From time to time, we may differ a little, Mr. Secretary, on some of your specific proposals, but I, as one member, believe that you are committed to the health and welfare of our people.

The budget request for 1988 for your department includes over $360 billion for the programs which mean so much to the people of this country. This is more than one-third of the total Federal

(1)

budget. Mr. Secretary, we intend to work with you and to produce a good appropriations bill, which moves us closer to our common goal.

Now, Mr. Secretary, again, I want you to know that I, as one member of this committee, believe that you are an excellent secretary.

HISTORY OF BILL

Mr. Secretary, this bill has an unusual history. You go back and check this bill from 1969 up to 1974, and you will find it was vetoed seven times in six years. A little unusual, seven times in six years.

One time, we took the education money out of this bill, and made a separate bill out of it. The President just vetoed both of them. We overrode four times; failed three times. President Reagan has signed this bill every time it has gone down to him as a bill, an individual appropriations bill, and that speaks well not only for the administration, but for our subcommittee.

As I have said a lot of times, Mr. Secretary, when I first became a member of this committee, we had $77 million in the appropriations bill for the National Institutes of Health. Now we are a little over $6 billion and that is the way it should be.

Mr. Conte, as you know is unable to be with us, but as the ranking minority member on this subcommittee, he and I together with the other subcommittee members work together. We like each other, Mr. Secretary. We like this bill. We took this bill two years ago over on the House floor and passed it in an hour and 53 minutes.

This is the same bill that used to require five, six, seven days. Every member in the House regardless of politics, knows that this is the people's bill. We believe that, Mr. Secretary. We will be glad to here from you.

Secretary BowEN. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee. I am pleased to have the opportunity to testify before you today on the fiscal year 1988 budget of the Department of Health and Human Services.

As you requested, I have already submitted for the record a detailed statement. I will now summarize that statement and share with you my thoughts on the issues and challenges that it poses.

BUDGET SUMMARY

This budget calls for an outlay of $361 billion for a wide variety of health, income security and social services programs and amounts to 35 percent of the Federal budget.

It is $13 billion higher than 1987's, reflecting increases in benefits, more beneficiaries, and the growing cost of health care. But our new budget request also achieves outlay savings of $9 billion, while still meeting legally mandated deficit reduction targets.

In addition, I would like to highlight a major initiative of the administration which is soon to be introduced to Congress. This legislation would protect 30 million elderly and disabled Americans from the threat of catastrophic illness. Under this proposal, Medicare beneficiaries would receive catastrophic illness coverage by

« PreviousContinue »