Deferral and Rescission of Appropriations, 1975-1976: Hearings Before Subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session, Part 4

Front Cover

From inside the book

Selected pages

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 139 - State, and (B) students in residential schools for the handicapped (including mentally retarded, hard of hearing, deaf, speech impaired, visually handicapped, seriously emotionally disturbed, crippled, or other health impaired persons who by reason thereof require special education) operated or substantially supported by the State.
Page 59 - General finds that the President, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the head of any department or agency of the United States, or any other officer or employee of the United States...
Page 53 - SEC. 163. (a) The Secretary of Transportation shall enter into such arrangements as may be necessary to carry out demonstration projects in Lincoln, Nebraska, Wheeling, West Virginia, and Elko, Nevada, for the relocation of railroad lines from the central area of the cities in conformance with the methodology developed under proposals submitted to the Secretary by the respective cities. The cities shall (1) have a local agency with legal authority to relocate railroad facilities, levy taxes for such...
Page 42 - Traditionally, the largest percentage of nursing schools, ie, hospital—based institutions, have been financed through patient care costs. No convincing case has been made that limited Federal resources should be used to replace the traditional resources of financial support for such training. In addition...
Page 75 - We will supply that for the record, Mr. Chairman. [The information follows...
Page 46 - This withdrawal of funds is one of several special actions proposed by the President to restrain 1975 budget outlays, and is consistent with the Conference Report on the Labor/HEW Appropriations Bill which indicated Congressional willingness ". . . to give full consideration to such rescissions and deferrals . . ." as might be required to keep 1975 spending within the total budget estimate for the bill (p.
Page 79 - July 1 message. [The information follows:] To the Congress of the United States: I herewith propose three rescissions and report twenty-seven deferrals in accordance with the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The rescission proposals total $123.7 million and the deferrals total $2,729.4 million for a total of $2,853.0 million in fiscal year 1976 budget authority. Funds for two highway programs, one duplicating an existing system and one that could be funded through Federal-aid highway funds now available...
Page 108 - Commission was reactivated in 1947, and iu 1949 received a $250,000 appropriation from Congress for the parkway feasibility study by the National Park Service and the Bureau of Public Roads. The study was published in 1951 at a cost of $150,000 ; the remaining $100.000 was returned to the Treasury. That study recommended a parkway — since changed to a scenic highway — along the Mississippi River, crossing back and forth over mostly existing or planned highways to avoid duplication and excessive...
Page 5 - These funds were intended for planning of future hospital construction, but because the act has not been extended and all construction funds under the act have been allocated, we have no plans to obligate these funds. Mr. Chairman, I have with me representatives of the three health agencies affected by these rescissions, and we will be pleased to answer any questions you may have with regard to these proposals. HEALTH TEACHING FACILITIES Mr. FLOOD. As you can imagine, we take a pretty careful look...
Page 2 - Director of the Bureau of Drugs in the Food and Drug Administration, a post he had held since April 1970. As Dr. Edwards

Bibliographic information