Page images
PDF
EPUB

The flood and sediment reduction benefits of this program will vary according to which reservoirs are constructed. Their average annual value will be approximately as follows:

With Santa Rosa Reservoir constructed and Gibraltar Reservoir enlarged, $48,400.

With Santa Rosa and Cachuma Reservoirs constructed and Gibraltar Reservoir unchanged, $52,700.

In addition to the flood-control benefits, this program will provide benefits in the form of reduced fire-suppression cost of $19,600 annually, and in the form of increased farm income, of $213,600 annually. Total average annual benefits will thus be $281,600, or $285,000, depending upon which reservoirs are built.

The average annual cost of the program is approximately $131,000. The average annual Federal cost is approximately $38,300.

Actual costs, average annual costs, and average annual benefits of the two programs planned are given in table 1.

97226-44. -2

TABLE 1.-Costs, direct evaluated benefits, and benefits per dollar of cost for alternative U. S. Department of Agriculture programs, Santa Ynez

watershed

[blocks in formation]

Plan 1 with Cachuma Dam? onstructed; Gibraltar Dam unchanged:

Forest land 3.

241, 040

Farm land.

241, 040

8,436

21, 791

1,997

21, 791

Structural measures.

1,997

30, 227

70

320

17, 536

177, 425

17,856

3, 520

180, 945

6, 333

776

1, 258

2, 034

390 7, 109

30, 227 17,926 8, 367

Total.

420, 462

3,520

423, 982

14, 839

22, 111

776

18, 794

41, 681

37,726

56, 520

Plan 1 with Cachuma Dam constructed; Gibraltar Dam enlarged:

[blocks in formation]

Plan 2 with Santa Rosa Dam constructed; Gibraltar Dam enlarged:

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Plan 2 with Santa Rosa and Cachuma Dams constructed; Gibraltar Dam

[blocks in formation]

1 To obtain the average annual equivalent of values which occur at other than uniform annual intervals, costs due or benefits accruing each year are discounted to the present, added and multiplied by the discount rate. The rate used throughout was 31⁄2 percent.

2 Juncal Reservoir is included in all calculations for Gilbraltar Reservoir.

3 Cost of forest land program for entire watershed is compared with benefits of sedimentation prevention in individual drainage areas.

TABLE 1.-Costs, direct evaluated benefits, and benefits per dollar of cost for alternative U. S. Department of Agriculture programs, Santa Ynez watershed-Continued

[subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]
[blocks in formation]

Plan 2 with Santa Rosa and Cachuma Dams constructed; Gibraltar Dam unchanged:

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

1 To obtain the average annual equivalent of values which occur at other than uniform annual intervals, costs due or benefits accruing each year are discounted to the present, added and multiplied by the discount rate. The rate used throughout was 31⁄2 percent.

2 Juncal Reservoir is included in all calculations for Gibraltar Reservoir.

Cost of forest land program for entire watershed is compared with benefits of sedimentation prevention in individual drainage areas.

« PreviousContinue »