1. 2. 3. Contrast of "between bottle" and "within Interlaboratory disagreement of assay results Comparison of NBS individual assay values for (Appendix B) 1. NBS initial results for standard concentrate "D", Bottles I and II (sampled in helium on 7-21; titrated on 7-30-58) 2. NBS initial results for standard concentrate 3. NBS initial results for standard concentrate "E" (sampled in dry air on 8-8; titrated on 8-15-58). 4. NBS initial results for standard concentrate "F" (sampled in dry air on 8-20; titrated on 69 5. NBS recheck and initial average results 70 (Appendix B; Youden) 1. 2. CONTENTS (Con't) Statistical analysis of ranges for 45 sets Averages of the 45 sets of four determina- (Appendix D) Changes in weight of Blockson samples during FIGURE NO. LIST OF FIGURES PAGE 75 77 91 1. Change in weight of INX samples and/or caps 14 2. Change in weight of INX samples and/or caps 15 3. Change in weight of separate components of Relative laboratory positions and average 1. NBS results for drying IMCC material in room air FIGURE NO. CONTENTS (Con't) PAGE (Appendix C) 2. NBS results for drying pre-treated IMCC material in "dry" air 3. NBS results for heating pre-treated IMCC material in humid air (about 0.013 g H20/g 83 85 STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIALS: ANALYSIS OF URANIUM CONCENTRATES AT THE M. S. Richmond Institute for Materials Research ABSTRACT NBS experiences with the problems of assaying uranium concentrates are described. Umpire determinations of Also, uranium were performed on several thousands of ore concen- sented. Key words: analytical procedure, assay, sampling base line, standard Uz0g, umpire determinations, uranium concentrates. |