Regulatory Reform Legislation: Hearings Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... oversight by other govern- mental institutions . As a result , the agency decisional process takes on a crucial significance unparalleled in prior administrative law . It thus be- comes all the more important for the public to have ...
... oversight by other govern- mental institutions . As a result , the agency decisional process takes on a crucial significance unparalleled in prior administrative law . It thus be- comes all the more important for the public to have ...
Page 16
... oversight by other governmental institutions . As a re- sult , the agency decisional process takes on a crucial signifi- cance unparalleled in prior administrative law . It thus becomes all the more important for the public to have ...
... oversight by other governmental institutions . As a re- sult , the agency decisional process takes on a crucial signifi- cance unparalleled in prior administrative law . It thus becomes all the more important for the public to have ...
Page 17
... , regardless of whether the proceeding is formal or informal . See , e.g. , Automotive Parts and Accessories Ass'n v . Boyd , 407 F.2d 333 , 338 ( D.C.Cir . 1968 ) . 6 . But neither of these oversight functions can take 17.
... , regardless of whether the proceeding is formal or informal . See , e.g. , Automotive Parts and Accessories Ass'n v . Boyd , 407 F.2d 333 , 338 ( D.C.Cir . 1968 ) . 6 . But neither of these oversight functions can take 17.
Page 18
... oversight functions can take place if the agency does not expose itself to all available informa- tion . Review is not possible in any forum if the agency does not openly avow the factual inferences and value assumptions it has made ...
... oversight functions can take place if the agency does not expose itself to all available informa- tion . Review is not possible in any forum if the agency does not openly avow the factual inferences and value assumptions it has made ...
Page 29
... oversight of the agency's deci- sional process . b . The agency should be required to respond to significant issues raised by the public comments on any proposed rule . This requirement is incorporated in S. 755 , and codifies existing ...
... oversight of the agency's deci- sional process . b . The agency should be required to respond to significant issues raised by the public comments on any proposed rule . This requirement is incorporated in S. 755 , and codifies existing ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adjudication Administrative Conference administrative law judges Administrative Procedure Act administrative process agency's ALJ's American Bar Association American Hospital Association appointment Bar Association believe benefits billion bills Board Chairman RIBICOFF Commission Committee compliance concern Congress Congressional Congressional Budget Office CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COUNCIL courts CUTLER decision economic effect energy environmental estimates evaluation executive branch Executive Order 12044 federal agencies Federal Regulation functions Government hearing examiners impact important independent industry issues Jimmy Carter Judge BAZELON judicial review labor legislation limited term major rule ment Morrison National NCIC NLRB Office oversight paperwork performance President problem proceedings proposed rule question reappointment recommend record regulatory agencies regulatory analysis regulatory process regulatory reform responsibility role rulemaking safety Section selective certification Senator EAGLETON Senator MATHIAS Senator PERCY specific STAATS staff standards statement statute substantial testimony tion Washington
Popular passages
Page 1198 - Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary, or any duly authorized subcommittee thereof, is authorized and directed to make a full and complete study and investigation...
Page 651 - In the event the manager of the resolution is in favor of any such motion or appeal, the time in opposition thereto shall be controlled by the minority leader or his designee.
Page 270 - Examiners shall be removable by the agency in which they are employed only for good cause established and determined by the Civil Service Commission (hereinafter called the Commission) after opportunity for hearing and upon the record thereof. Examiners shall receive compensation prescribed by the Commission independently of agency recommendations or ratings...
Page 263 - ... shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall perform no duties inconsistent with their duties and responsibilities as examiners.
Page 1141 - Act, as amended, shall not be applicable. Agencies occasionally or temporarily insufficiently staffed may utilize examiners selected by the Commission from and with the consent of other agencies. For the purposes of this section, the Commission is authorized to make investigations, require reports by agencies, issue reports, including an annual report to the Congress, promulgate rules, appoint such advisory committees as may be deemed necessary, recommend legislation, subpena witnesses or records,...
Page 841 - ... 3 (b) Section 575 of such title is amended by adding at the 4 end thereof the following new subsection: 5...
Page 106 - Weidenbaum, director of the Center for the Study of American Business at Washington University in St. Louis, and a former assistant secretary of the treasury for economic policy, calls these social issues "the new wave of federal government regulation of business.
Page 707 - When rules are required by statute to be made on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, sections 556 and 557 of this title apply instead of this subsection.
Page 270 - Hearing examiners appointed under section 3105 of this title are entitled to pay prescribed by the Civil Service Commission independently of agency recommendations or ratings and in accordance with subchapter III of this chapter and chapter 51 of this title.
Page 275 - There can be little doubt that the role of the modern federal hearing examiner or administrative law judge within this framework is 'functionally comparable' to that of a judge. His powers are often, if not generally, comparable to those of a trial judge: He may issue subpoenas, rule on proffers of evidence, regulate the course of the hearing, and make or recommend decisions.