...imitation. It does not purport nor represent to be what it is not — the Administrator's genuine "jam." In our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...beyond the point where Congress indicated it would stop. The Government would have us hold that when the Administrator standardizes the ingredients of...

...similar attempt to overreach the authority granted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act : " 'In our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...to extend the scope of the statute beyond the point when Congress indicated it would stop. United States v. 62 Cases, Etc., 340 US 5!)3, 600 (1951).' "The...

...In upholding the Secretary's construction of the Act, we are not unmindful of our warning that "[i]n our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...beyond the point where Congress indicated it would stop." 62 Cases ol Jam v. United States, 340 19 Cf. AMP Inc. v. Gardner, 389 F. 2d 825, 830 (CA 2d...

...circumstances. To be sure, the paramount objective of the Act is to protect the public health. But TQn'onr anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose of...beyond the point where Congress indicated it would stop." etCcoe*of Jam * United Stale*, 840 VS. 698, 600, 71 S.Ct 615, 620, 96 L.EA 666 (1961). (7) The-...

...objective of the Act k to protect the public health. But "tQn our anxiety to effectuate the congreaakmal purpose of protecting the public, we must take care not to extend the scope of die atatnto beyond the point where Congreat indicated it would atop." «Cow»o/ Jam K United Stalet,...

...circumstances. To be sure, the paramount objective of the Act Is to protect the public health. Bat "|ihi our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...beyond the point where Congress Indicated it would stop " (3 Cues e>/ Jam F. United States. 340 US 593. 600, 71 S.Ct 615, 520, 15 L.Ed 566 (1951). (Tl...

...circumstances. To be sure, the paramount objective of foe Act is to protect the public health. But "[i]n our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...beyond the point where Congress indicated it would stop." Si Cote* of Jam v. United States, 340 US. 593, 600, 71 S.Ct 515, 520, 95 L-Ed. 566 (1951). [7]...

...circumstances. To be aure, the paramount objective of the Act Is tn protect the public health. But "|ijn our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose...statute beyond the point where Congress Indicated ft would stop." ft Coats of Jnm v. United State*. 340 US 593, 600, 71 S.Ct 616, 520. 95 L.Ed. 566 (1961)....

...circumstances. To be sore, the paramount objective of the Act is to protect the public health. But "ti]n our anxiety to effectuate the congressional purpose of protecting the public, we most take care not to extend the scope of the statute beyond the point where Congress indicated it...

...agency's action was not "grounded in a valid grant of authority from Congress," id. , because it extended '"the scope of the statute beyond the point where Congress indicated it would stop.'" Id. (quoting United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-Unidisk, 394 US 784, 800 (1969),...