Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... period preceding issuance of the permit , written com- ments objecting to the permit were submitted by David Fletcher and his consultant , John Williams . These comments were withdrawn in writing prior to the end of the public com- ment ...
... period preceding issuance of the permit , written com- ments objecting to the permit were submitted by David Fletcher and his consultant , John Williams . These comments were withdrawn in writing prior to the end of the public com- ment ...
Page 3
... period equivalent to not greater than 0.1 lb NO / MBtu on an 8,760 hrs / yr basis ( 135 TPY ) . For CO emissions : Good combustion practice , and An emission limit of 0.35 pounds CO per million British thermal units ( lb CO / MMBtu ) on ...
... period equivalent to not greater than 0.1 lb NO / MBtu on an 8,760 hrs / yr basis ( 135 TPY ) . For CO emissions : Good combustion practice , and An emission limit of 0.35 pounds CO per million British thermal units ( lb CO / MMBtu ) on ...
Page 6
... period ( including any public hear- ing ) to the extent required by these regulations *** . 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) . The applicable regulations require that : all persons who believe any condition of a draft permit is inappropriate ...
... period ( including any public hear- ing ) to the extent required by these regulations *** . 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) . The applicable regulations require that : all persons who believe any condition of a draft permit is inappropriate ...
Page 8
... period . 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) ( petitioner must show that any issues raised on appeal were raised during the public com- ment period to the extent required by the regulations ) ; 40 C.F.R. § 124.13 ( all reasonably ascertainable ...
... period . 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) ( petitioner must show that any issues raised on appeal were raised during the public com- ment period to the extent required by the regulations ) ; 40 C.F.R. § 124.13 ( all reasonably ascertainable ...
Page 11
... period running from June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 , 1995 ; ( 3 ) in the alternative , if a violation did occur during the period running from June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 , 1995 , the ALJ erred with respect to his determination of ...
... period running from June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 , 1995 ; ( 3 ) in the alternative , if a violation did occur during the period running from June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 , 1995 , the ALJ erred with respect to his determination of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands