Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... filed by Stanley W. Clev- erly ( " Petitioner " ) , a resident of Aberdeen who resides within 1000 feet of the proposed facility . As explained below , the Petition is dismissed because the issues . for which the Petitioner seeks review ...
... filed by Stanley W. Clev- erly ( " Petitioner " ) , a resident of Aberdeen who resides within 1000 feet of the proposed facility . As explained below , the Petition is dismissed because the issues . for which the Petitioner seeks review ...
Page 5
... filed a timely petition for review ( " Petition " ) of the Permit with the Board . WDOE filed a response ( " Re- sponse " ) seeking summary disposition on December 6 , 2002. Petitioner filed a timely reply ( " Reply " ) to WDOE's ...
... filed a timely petition for review ( " Petition " ) of the Permit with the Board . WDOE filed a response ( " Re- sponse " ) seeking summary disposition on December 6 , 2002. Petitioner filed a timely reply ( " Reply " ) to WDOE's ...
Page 21
... filed on April 16 , 2002 , raises five is- sues : ( 1 ) whether the total penalty assessed by the ALJ is excessive ; ( 2 ) whether the ALJ erred when he found that a violation occurred during the period June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 ...
... filed on April 16 , 2002 , raises five is- sues : ( 1 ) whether the total penalty assessed by the ALJ is excessive ; ( 2 ) whether the ALJ erred when he found that a violation occurred during the period June 30 , 1995 , to October 26 ...
Page 40
... filed by Verena Owen ( “ Ms. Owen ” ) . IEPA previously issued a PSD permit for the Facility . However , Kendall did not begin construction of the Facility within the 18 - month period allowed by the PSD regula- tions . Kendall ...
... filed by Verena Owen ( “ Ms. Owen ” ) . IEPA previously issued a PSD permit for the Facility . However , Kendall did not begin construction of the Facility within the 18 - month period allowed by the PSD regula- tions . Kendall ...
Page 48
... filed comments during the public comment period may raise in a petition for review any issues that were raised by someone ( either the peti- tioner or another commenter ) during the public comment period and any issues that were not ...
... filed comments during the public comment period may raise in a petition for review any issues that were raised by someone ( either the peti- tioner or another commenter ) during the public comment period and any issues that were not ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands