Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 28
... fact that , fortunately , there were no long - term environmental consequences that flowed from Capozzi's neglect . Capozzi has failed to persuade us that the ALJ's penalty assessment was overly punitive under the circumstances ...
... fact that , fortunately , there were no long - term environmental consequences that flowed from Capozzi's neglect . Capozzi has failed to persuade us that the ALJ's penalty assessment was overly punitive under the circumstances ...
Page 96
... Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4 & Chron . at 6. Subsequently , KMS received oral approval of the alterna- tive test method on August 15 , 2000. Init . Dec. at 19 ( Findings of Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4 & Chron . at 6. On August 17 , 2000 ...
... Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4 & Chron . at 6. Subsequently , KMS received oral approval of the alterna- tive test method on August 15 , 2000. Init . Dec. at 19 ( Findings of Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4 & Chron . at 6. On August 17 , 2000 ...
Page 99
... fact that IEPA had issued permits to the facility that did not fully address NSPS concerns , indicia of CDT's good faith efforts to com- ply and the true seriousness ( or lack thereof ) of the violations . Init . Dec. at 26. For these ...
... fact that IEPA had issued permits to the facility that did not fully address NSPS concerns , indicia of CDT's good faith efforts to com- ply and the true seriousness ( or lack thereof ) of the violations . Init . Dec. at 26. For these ...
Page 101
... fact , the ALJ observed that the applicable regulation re- quired CDT to conduct a performance test of the gas control system no later than 180 days after initial startup24 and that CDT had not conducted the required test- ing until ...
... fact , the ALJ observed that the applicable regulation re- quired CDT to conduct a performance test of the gas control system no later than 180 days after initial startup24 and that CDT had not conducted the required test- ing until ...
Page 103
... Fact 28-29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4-6 & Chron . at 4. IEPA approved the alter- native test method on August 15 , 2000. Init . Dec. at 19 ( Findings of Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 5 . As discussed above , the ALJ dismissed this Count because he ...
... Fact 28-29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 4-6 & Chron . at 4. IEPA approved the alter- native test method on August 15 , 2000. Init . Dec. at 19 ( Findings of Fact 29 ) ; R Ex . 18 at 5 . As discussed above , the ALJ dismissed this Count because he ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands