Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 10
... evidentiary hearing on the issue of liability for Counts I , II , and III and on the penalty issue , the ALJ found Capozzi liable for Counts I , II , and III . On the issue of the penalty , the ALJ rejected the Region's proposed penalty ...
... evidentiary hearing on the issue of liability for Counts I , II , and III and on the penalty issue , the ALJ found Capozzi liable for Counts I , II , and III . On the issue of the penalty , the ALJ rejected the Region's proposed penalty ...
Page 11
... evidentiary hearing . ( 3 ) The Board affirms the ALJ's treatment of the issue of multiple violations spring- ing from a single transgression because the ALJ was not bound by the RCRA Penalty Policy , and because the Penalty Policy's ...
... evidentiary hearing . ( 3 ) The Board affirms the ALJ's treatment of the issue of multiple violations spring- ing from a single transgression because the ALJ was not bound by the RCRA Penalty Policy , and because the Penalty Policy's ...
Page 19
... evidentiary hearing on November 15 , 2000. Finally , the Region further reduced its penalty proposal to $ 156,064 following the evidentiary hearing.15 2. Capozzi's Answer to Region V's Complaint On April 26 , 2000 , Capozzi answered the ...
... evidentiary hearing on November 15 , 2000. Finally , the Region further reduced its penalty proposal to $ 156,064 following the evidentiary hearing.15 2. Capozzi's Answer to Region V's Complaint On April 26 , 2000 , Capozzi answered the ...
Page 20
... Evidentiary Hearing On November 15-16 , 2000 , an evidentiary hearing was conducted before the ALJ in Chicago , Illinois , pursuant to 40 C.F.R. part 22. During that hearing the ALJ considered the issue of liability for Counts I , II ...
... Evidentiary Hearing On November 15-16 , 2000 , an evidentiary hearing was conducted before the ALJ in Chicago , Illinois , pursuant to 40 C.F.R. part 22. During that hearing the ALJ considered the issue of liability for Counts I , II ...
Page 59
... evidentiary hearing , the ALJ concluded that the two corporations operated on the same site and were under " common control , " and thus constituted a “ facility ” under EPCRA . Accordingly , the ALJ found that CWPI had commit- ted five ...
... evidentiary hearing , the ALJ concluded that the two corporations operated on the same site and were under " common control , " and thus constituted a “ facility ” under EPCRA . Accordingly , the ALJ found that CWPI had commit- ted five ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands