Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 22
... evidence in the record , and the reasonable inferences of fact that this evidence supports . First , the Region firmly established that Capozzi's routine method of dis- posing of solvent waste was to throw it onto the ground immediately ...
... evidence in the record , and the reasonable inferences of fact that this evidence supports . First , the Region firmly established that Capozzi's routine method of dis- posing of solvent waste was to throw it onto the ground immediately ...
Page 37
... evidence on the costs of proper offsite disposal or the costs of the waste characterization needed for offsite disposal.35 Absent such proof , which clearly fell to the Region to adduce , 36 we have no basis for rejecting the ALJ's ...
... evidence on the costs of proper offsite disposal or the costs of the waste characterization needed for offsite disposal.35 Absent such proof , which clearly fell to the Region to adduce , 36 we have no basis for rejecting the ALJ's ...
Page 89
... evidence during such proceedings . Moreover , in this case , the specific information at issue was not available at the time of the answer or during the period of prehearing information exchange , the financial information was relevant ...
... evidence during such proceedings . Moreover , in this case , the specific information at issue was not available at the time of the answer or during the period of prehearing information exchange , the financial information was relevant ...
Page 90
... evidence financial informa- tion - a combined balance sheet from the year 2000 ( “ Combined Balance Sheet " ) - which CDT had only made available to the Region and the ALJ approximately one week before the hearing . Id . at 18-25 ...
... evidence financial informa- tion - a combined balance sheet from the year 2000 ( “ Combined Balance Sheet " ) - which CDT had only made available to the Region and the ALJ approximately one week before the hearing . Id . at 18-25 ...
Page 98
... Evidence at Hearing ( " Motion to Limit Evi- dence " ) ( Jan. 9 , 2001 ) ; 18 Complainant's Motion to Exclude Evidence ( " Motion to Exclude " ) ( Jan. 12 , 2001 ) . At the January 17 , 2001 hearing , the ALJ admitted CDT's Combined ...
... Evidence at Hearing ( " Motion to Limit Evi- dence " ) ( Jan. 9 , 2001 ) ; 18 Complainant's Motion to Exclude Evidence ( " Motion to Exclude " ) ( Jan. 12 , 2001 ) . At the January 17 , 2001 hearing , the ALJ admitted CDT's Combined ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands