Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... discussed below , the Petition is dismissed . A. Standard of Review II . DISCUSSION The Board's review of PSD permitting decisions is governed by 40 C.F.R. part 124 , which " provides the yardstick against which the Board must measure ...
... discussed below , the Petition is dismissed . A. Standard of Review II . DISCUSSION The Board's review of PSD permitting decisions is governed by 40 C.F.R. part 124 , which " provides the yardstick against which the Board must measure ...
Page 37
... discussed below , we do not find that this inaccuracy by itself warrants reversal of the ALJ's holding on this issue . 35 Likewise , the Region did not develop , or provide evidentiary support for , the theory that Capozzi's soil ...
... discussed below , we do not find that this inaccuracy by itself warrants reversal of the ALJ's holding on this issue . 35 Likewise , the Region did not develop , or provide evidentiary support for , the theory that Capozzi's soil ...
Page 49
... discussed the " equivalent emission limit " found in Permit Attachment B , table 1. Response at 7 ( emphasis added ) . Thus , IEPA was aware that Ms. Owen had concerns re- garding the limit for CO emissions . Ms. Owen also identified a ...
... discussed the " equivalent emission limit " found in Permit Attachment B , table 1. Response at 7 ( emphasis added ) . Thus , IEPA was aware that Ms. Owen had concerns re- garding the limit for CO emissions . Ms. Owen also identified a ...
Page 56
... discussed in part II.B.2 above , Ms. Owen has failed to show that facilities comparable to Kendall's in terms of size of the turbines , simple - cycle operation , limited hours of operation for peaking periods , and higher NOx limits ...
... discussed in part II.B.2 above , Ms. Owen has failed to show that facilities comparable to Kendall's in terms of size of the turbines , simple - cycle operation , limited hours of operation for peaking periods , and higher NOx limits ...
Page 62
... discussed infra , the issue of common control in the statutory definition of “ facility ” is central to the issues in this case . The EPCRA section 313 reporting regulation includes the statutory defini- tion of " facility , " but also ...
... discussed infra , the issue of common control in the statutory definition of “ facility ” is central to the issues in this case . The EPCRA section 313 reporting regulation includes the statutory defini- tion of " facility , " but also ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands