Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 59
... concluded that the two corporations operated on the same site and were under " common control , " and thus constituted a “ facility ” under EPCRA . Accordingly , the ALJ found that CWPI had commit- ted five violations of EPCRA section ...
... concluded that the two corporations operated on the same site and were under " common control , " and thus constituted a “ facility ” under EPCRA . Accordingly , the ALJ found that CWPI had commit- ted five violations of EPCRA section ...
Page 60
... concluded that CWPI and CCL constitute a single facility . ( 2 ) The ALJ did not commit error in concluding that the facility satisfies the statu- tory threshold for number of employees by totaling the number of CCL's employees and ...
... concluded that CWPI and CCL constitute a single facility . ( 2 ) The ALJ did not commit error in concluding that the facility satisfies the statu- tory threshold for number of employees by totaling the number of CCL's employees and ...
Page 67
... concluded , in relevant part , that CWPI's " facility , comprised of the establishments of [ CWPI and CCL ] , is located on a single site and is owned and / or operated by the same person ( or by any person which controls , is con ...
... concluded , in relevant part , that CWPI's " facility , comprised of the establishments of [ CWPI and CCL ] , is located on a single site and is owned and / or operated by the same person ( or by any person which controls , is con ...
Page 68
... concluded that the EPA's interpretation of the regulation " is fair and reasonable and is consistent with the statutory intent of EPCRA and the im- plementing regulatory scheme . " Id . at 14 ( citing In re Mobil Oil Corp. , 5 E.A.D. ...
... concluded that the EPA's interpretation of the regulation " is fair and reasonable and is consistent with the statutory intent of EPCRA and the im- plementing regulatory scheme . " Id . at 14 ( citing In re Mobil Oil Corp. , 5 E.A.D. ...
Page 69
... concluded that the Region's " methodology in calcu- lating the amount of added value attributable to each establishment *** is not [ to ] be applied unquestioningly , [ but ] it is a fair and reasonable approach and clearly is the more ...
... concluded that the Region's " methodology in calcu- lating the amount of added value attributable to each establishment *** is not [ to ] be applied unquestioningly , [ but ] it is a fair and reasonable approach and clearly is the more ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands