Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
... argument in any event . ( 4 ) The Board affirms the ALJ's issuance of a compliance order inasmuch as Capozzi has ... argument to the con- trary notwithstanding , the ALJ did not ignore the environmental implications of Capozzi's illegal ...
... argument in any event . ( 4 ) The Board affirms the ALJ's issuance of a compliance order inasmuch as Capozzi has ... argument to the con- trary notwithstanding , the ALJ did not ignore the environmental implications of Capozzi's illegal ...
Page 24
... argument is also undermined by statements made by Cindy Gar- ris during the October 26 , 1995 and May 23 , 1996 inspections , wherein she indi- cated that in the four - and - a - half to five years she had worked for Capozzi , solvent ...
... argument is also undermined by statements made by Cindy Gar- ris during the October 26 , 1995 and May 23 , 1996 inspections , wherein she indi- cated that in the four - and - a - half to five years she had worked for Capozzi , solvent ...
Page 25
... argument incorrectly assumes that the ALJ was obligated to follow whatever guidance the RCRA Penalty Policy provided on this point . As the Board has explained on numerous occasions , penalty policies do not bind either the ALJ or the ...
... argument incorrectly assumes that the ALJ was obligated to follow whatever guidance the RCRA Penalty Policy provided on this point . As the Board has explained on numerous occasions , penalty policies do not bind either the ALJ or the ...
Page 47
... Argument that the CO Emission Limit of 25 ppmvd Does Not Represent BACT Ms. Owen argues that emissions limits for CO ... arguments in her Petition also lack specificity and are unsubstantiated . Id . at 10-13 . Finally , IEPA argues that ...
... Argument that the CO Emission Limit of 25 ppmvd Does Not Represent BACT Ms. Owen argues that emissions limits for CO ... arguments in her Petition also lack specificity and are unsubstantiated . Id . at 10-13 . Finally , IEPA argues that ...
Page 55
... arguments challenging IEPA's reliance on " generic cost factors , " Dr. Fox's testimony , and the published report of ... Argument that IEPA Should Consider the Size and Magnitude of Kendall's Facility in Setting BACT for CO Ms. Owen ...
... arguments challenging IEPA's reliance on " generic cost factors , " Dr. Fox's testimony , and the published report of ... Argument that IEPA Should Consider the Size and Magnitude of Kendall's Facility in Setting BACT for CO Ms. Owen ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands