Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 10
... analysis of hazardous waste before disposal ; ( 4 ) failing to maintain hazardous waste training records ; ( 5 ) failing to have a contingency plan ; and ( 6 ) failing to have a written closure plan . Region V proposed the assessment of ...
... analysis of hazardous waste before disposal ; ( 4 ) failing to maintain hazardous waste training records ; ( 5 ) failing to have a contingency plan ; and ( 6 ) failing to have a written closure plan . Region V proposed the assessment of ...
Page 17
... Analysis Performed by CSI On or about June 10 , 1996 , Capozzi obtained an analysis of its waste for the first time by submitting to Chemical Solvents , Inc. ( " CSI " ) a sample of its hazard- ous waste . C Ex 11 ; C Ex 9. In a ...
... Analysis Performed by CSI On or about June 10 , 1996 , Capozzi obtained an analysis of its waste for the first time by submitting to Chemical Solvents , Inc. ( " CSI " ) a sample of its hazard- ous waste . C Ex 11 ; C Ex 9. In a ...
Page 34
... analysis . While it may be true that the ALJ did not address the environmental implications of Capozzi's dumping without a permit for purposes of Count I , he does give them serious consideration under Count II . Specifically , the ALJ ...
... analysis . While it may be true that the ALJ did not address the environmental implications of Capozzi's dumping without a permit for purposes of Count I , he does give them serious consideration under Count II . Specifically , the ALJ ...
Page 35
... Analysis The Region's appeal also challenges the ALJ's penalty assessment for Count I with respect to the ALJ's ruling on the Region's economic benefit analy- sis , 33 on the basis that the ALJ rejected the Region's economic benefit ...
... Analysis The Region's appeal also challenges the ALJ's penalty assessment for Count I with respect to the ALJ's ruling on the Region's economic benefit analy- sis , 33 on the basis that the ALJ rejected the Region's economic benefit ...
Page 36
... analysis on the following The USEPA's " economic benefit " analysis is deserving of comment . Complainant submits that by failing to comply with the permit provisions in Count I , respondent saved $ 9,991 , i.e. , the avoided cost of ...
... analysis on the following The USEPA's " economic benefit " analysis is deserving of comment . Complainant submits that by failing to comply with the permit provisions in Count I , respondent saved $ 9,991 , i.e. , the avoided cost of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands