Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
... amount of waste Capozzi discarded during that time ; ( 4 ) the ALJ failed to apply the RCRA Penalty Policy principle regarding multiple violations springing from the same transgression ; and ( 5 ) the ALJ erred in issuing a com- pliance ...
... amount of waste Capozzi discarded during that time ; ( 4 ) the ALJ failed to apply the RCRA Penalty Policy principle regarding multiple violations springing from the same transgression ; and ( 5 ) the ALJ erred in issuing a com- pliance ...
Page 12
... amounts of hazardous waste , and because Capozzi is no longer in violation of RCRA and OAC permit- ting requirements ... amount of waste disposed of , the penalty , and the compliance order . For the reasons stated below , we affirm the ...
... amounts of hazardous waste , and because Capozzi is no longer in violation of RCRA and OAC permit- ting requirements ... amount of waste disposed of , the penalty , and the compliance order . For the reasons stated below , we affirm the ...
Page 21
... amount of waste Capozzi discarded ; ( 4 ) whether the ALJ erroneously failed to apply the RCRA Penalty Policy principle regarding multiple violations springing from the same transgression ; and ( 5 ) whether the ALJ erred in issuing a ...
... amount of waste Capozzi discarded ; ( 4 ) whether the ALJ erroneously failed to apply the RCRA Penalty Policy principle regarding multiple violations springing from the same transgression ; and ( 5 ) whether the ALJ erred in issuing a ...
Page 27
... amount of the penalty " to no more than $ 10,000.00 since this will be more than adequate to deter Mr. Capozzi form [ sic ] such conduct in the future . ” Id . at 22. In support of its argument for a reduced penalty , Capozzi reiterates ...
... amount of the penalty " to no more than $ 10,000.00 since this will be more than adequate to deter Mr. Capozzi form [ sic ] such conduct in the future . ” Id . at 22. In support of its argument for a reduced penalty , Capozzi reiterates ...
Page 29
... amount of waste , we also must recognize that Capozzi undermined the RCRA regulatory program and unnecessarily put the environment and the surrounding residential neighborhood at risk by , as a matter of course over several years ...
... amount of waste , we also must recognize that Capozzi undermined the RCRA regulatory program and unnecessarily put the environment and the surrounding residential neighborhood at risk by , as a matter of course over several years ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands