Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
... addition , Region V's argument to the con- trary notwithstanding , the ALJ did not ignore the environmental implications of Capozzi's illegal behavior . ( b ) The Board affirms the ALJ's rejection of Region V's eco- nomic benefit ...
... addition , Region V's argument to the con- trary notwithstanding , the ALJ did not ignore the environmental implications of Capozzi's illegal behavior . ( b ) The Board affirms the ALJ's rejection of Region V's eco- nomic benefit ...
Page 17
... addition , the soil sample taken from the burn area revealed the presence of acetone , methyl isobutyl ketone , and tolu- ene . Id .; C Ex 8. This finding was confirmed by the Material Safety Data Sheet ( " MSDS " ) provided to OEPA by ...
... addition , the soil sample taken from the burn area revealed the presence of acetone , methyl isobutyl ketone , and tolu- ene . Id .; C Ex 8. This finding was confirmed by the Material Safety Data Sheet ( " MSDS " ) provided to OEPA by ...
Page 20
... addition , Capozzi asserted that the proposed penalties were excessive and unreasonable . Id . at 8 . 3. Summary Judgment Order In an order dated November 9 , 2000 , the ALJ granted the Region's motion for accelerated decision on ...
... addition , Capozzi asserted that the proposed penalties were excessive and unreasonable . Id . at 8 . 3. Summary Judgment Order In an order dated November 9 , 2000 , the ALJ granted the Region's motion for accelerated decision on ...
Page 24
... addition , John Capozzi testified during the hearing held in this matter that after the first OEPA inspection on October 26 , 1995 , the facility accumulated eight gallons of hazardous waste from one job alone.23 21 See Letter from ...
... addition , John Capozzi testified during the hearing held in this matter that after the first OEPA inspection on October 26 , 1995 , the facility accumulated eight gallons of hazardous waste from one job alone.23 21 See Letter from ...
Page 38
... addition , the RCRA Penalty Policy provides , in relevant part , " [ t ] he burden to demonstrate inability to pay rests on the Respondent , as it does in any mitigating circumstance . *** If the respondent fails to fully provide ...
... addition , the RCRA Penalty Policy provides , in relevant part , " [ t ] he burden to demonstrate inability to pay rests on the Respondent , as it does in any mitigating circumstance . *** If the respondent fails to fully provide ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands