Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page lvi
... Petition No. 96- 3 ( EAB , Apr. 24 , 2001 ) . Titan Wheel Corp. , 10 EAD 526 ( EAB 2002 ) · Tondu Energy Co. , 9 EAD 710 ( EAB 2001 ) Town of Ashland Wastewater Treatment Facility , 9 EAD 661 ( EAB 2001 ) . . Town of Westborough , 10 ...
... Petition No. 96- 3 ( EAB , Apr. 24 , 2001 ) . Titan Wheel Corp. , 10 EAD 526 ( EAB 2002 ) · Tondu Energy Co. , 9 EAD 710 ( EAB 2001 ) Town of Ashland Wastewater Treatment Facility , 9 EAD 661 ( EAB 2001 ) . . Town of Westborough , 10 ...
Page 1
... PETITION FOR REVIEW Decided January 7 , 2003 Syllabus Stanley W. Cleverly ( " Petitioner " ) appeals an October 17 , 2002 decision of the Washington Department of Ecology ( “ WDOE ” ) to issue a Prevention of Significant Deteri- oration ...
... PETITION FOR REVIEW Decided January 7 , 2003 Syllabus Stanley W. Cleverly ( " Petitioner " ) appeals an October 17 , 2002 decision of the Washington Department of Ecology ( “ WDOE ” ) to issue a Prevention of Significant Deteri- oration ...
Page 2
... petition for review ( " Petition " ) was filed by Stanley W. Clev- erly ( " Petitioner " ) , a resident of Aberdeen who resides within 1000 feet of the proposed facility . As explained below , the Petition is dismissed because the ...
... petition for review ( " Petition " ) was filed by Stanley W. Clev- erly ( " Petitioner " ) , a resident of Aberdeen who resides within 1000 feet of the proposed facility . As explained below , the Petition is dismissed because the ...
Page 5
... petition for review ( " Petition " ) of the Permit with the Board . WDOE filed a response ( " Re- sponse " ) seeking summary disposition on December 6 , 2002. Petitioner filed a timely reply ( " Reply " ) to WDOE's response on December ...
... petition for review ( " Petition " ) of the Permit with the Board . WDOE filed a response ( " Re- sponse " ) seeking summary disposition on December 6 , 2002. Petitioner filed a timely reply ( " Reply " ) to WDOE's response on December ...
Page 8
... Petition is denied on this ground . C. Petitioner Has Not Demonstrated an Abuse of Discretion Warranting Review Petitioner argues that because the Fletcher and Williams comments alleg- edly " had considerable merit , " WDOE abused its ...
... Petition is denied on this ground . C. Petitioner Has Not Demonstrated an Abuse of Discretion Warranting Review Petitioner argues that because the Fletcher and Williams comments alleg- edly " had considerable merit , " WDOE abused its ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands