Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 199
... Creek , a navigable waterbody , were situated on Field # 5 prior to its deep ripping by Respondent . CX 4-6 . As for Fields # 3 and # 4 , EPA Region IX dispatched Mr. Robert Leidy , a wetlands scientist , to conduct an " atyp- ical " or ...
... Creek , a navigable waterbody , were situated on Field # 5 prior to its deep ripping by Respondent . CX 4-6 . As for Fields # 3 and # 4 , EPA Region IX dispatched Mr. Robert Leidy , a wetlands scientist , to conduct an " atyp- ical " or ...
Page 222
... Creek on Field # 5 . After conducting our own de novo review of the administrative record , we find that the ALJ properly judged that the preponderance of the evidence in the administrative record supports these findings and that the ...
... Creek on Field # 5 . After conducting our own de novo review of the administrative record , we find that the ALJ properly judged that the preponderance of the evidence in the administrative record supports these findings and that the ...
Page 231
... Creek , and there is no evidence in the record establishing the existence of a continuous channel or series of jurisdic- tional waters for 1.5 miles to the East Run of Blackberry Creek . Appeal at 15. Thus , according to Bricks , the ...
... Creek , and there is no evidence in the record establishing the existence of a continuous channel or series of jurisdic- tional waters for 1.5 miles to the East Run of Blackberry Creek . Appeal at 15. Thus , according to Bricks , the ...
Page 232
... Creek . See Brief of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Complainant / Appellee ( " Region's Response " ) at 34. The water then flows into Blackberry Creek and thereafter makes its way to the Fox River , fifteen miles ...
... Creek . See Brief of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Complainant / Appellee ( " Region's Response " ) at 34. The water then flows into Blackberry Creek and thereafter makes its way to the Fox River , fifteen miles ...
Page 234
... Creek or a tributary thereof . Thus , contrary to the ALJ's and the Regions's sug- gestion , Mr. Kehoe's testimony does not establish that the wetlands at issue are ultimately hydrologically connected to the Fox River . B. Briggs ...
... Creek or a tributary thereof . Thus , contrary to the ALJ's and the Regions's sug- gestion , Mr. Kehoe's testimony does not establish that the wetlands at issue are ultimately hydrologically connected to the Fox River . B. Briggs ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands