Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 54
Page iii
... Cited xliv Table of Federal Statutes Cited lviii · Table of Federal Regulations Cited Decisions of the Environmental Appeal Board lxvi 1 Subject Index · . 807 TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Alaska Garrison ( See U.S. Army VOLUME 11.
... Cited xliv Table of Federal Statutes Cited lviii · Table of Federal Regulations Cited Decisions of the Environmental Appeal Board lxvi 1 Subject Index · . 807 TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Alaska Garrison ( See U.S. Army VOLUME 11.
Page v
... Alaska Garrison ( See U.S. Army Fort Wainwright Central Heating and Power Plant ) B & L Plating , Inc. , CAA Appeal No. 02-08 . • Bleach Tek Inc. ( William E. Comley , Inc. & Bleach Tek , Inc. , FIFRA Appeal No. 03-01 ) . . Bricks , Inc ...
... Alaska Garrison ( See U.S. Army Fort Wainwright Central Heating and Power Plant ) B & L Plating , Inc. , CAA Appeal No. 02-08 . • Bleach Tek Inc. ( William E. Comley , Inc. & Bleach Tek , Inc. , FIFRA Appeal No. 03-01 ) . . Bricks , Inc ...
Page 126
... Alaska Garrison ( " Alaska Garrison " ) from an order , dated April 30 , 2002 , issued by Chief Admin- istrative Law Judge Susan Biro ( “ ALJ ” ) . In her decision ( the " Penalty Criteria Decision " ) , the ALJ held that U.S. EPA ...
... Alaska Garrison ( " Alaska Garrison " ) from an order , dated April 30 , 2002 , issued by Chief Admin- istrative Law Judge Susan Biro ( “ ALJ ” ) . In her decision ( the " Penalty Criteria Decision " ) , the ALJ held that U.S. EPA ...
Page 127
... Alaska Garrison's important mission . Because this appeal seeks review only of questions of law largely in the abstract , it is not possible for the Board to speak definitively to the implications of its legal conclu- sions for the ...
... Alaska Garrison's important mission . Because this appeal seeks review only of questions of law largely in the abstract , it is not possible for the Board to speak definitively to the implications of its legal conclu- sions for the ...
Page 128
... Alaska Garrison appears to be correct in arguing that 10 U.S.C. §§ 114 ( a ) ( 6 ) , 2802 and 2805 prohibit Alaska Garrison from redirecting lump sum appropriations to a construction project costing more than $ 1.5 million that has not ...
... Alaska Garrison appears to be correct in arguing that 10 U.S.C. §§ 114 ( a ) ( 6 ) , 2802 and 2805 prohibit Alaska Garrison from redirecting lump sum appropriations to a construction project costing more than $ 1.5 million that has not ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir determination discharges draft permit economic benefit emissions unit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands