Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... standards under Subpart X because it has not revised its RCRA program to include such standards . See 52 Fed . Reg . 46946 , 46961-62 ( December 10 , 1987 ) ( State that is otherwise authorized to issue RCRA permits in lieu of the ...
... standards under Subpart X because it has not revised its RCRA program to include such standards . See 52 Fed . Reg . 46946 , 46961-62 ( December 10 , 1987 ) ( State that is otherwise authorized to issue RCRA permits in lieu of the ...
Page 9
... standards in 40 CFR § 264.601 . If the appli- cant can demonstrate that he does not violate the environmental performance standards of § 264.601 and the Director agrees with such demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and ...
... standards in 40 CFR § 264.601 . If the appli- cant can demonstrate that he does not violate the environmental performance standards of § 264.601 and the Director agrees with such demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and ...
Page 11
... Standards for Process Vents ) and of Subpart BB of Part 264 ( Air Emission Standards for Equipment Leaks ) . As for the existing air quality conditions , the permit application states that [ t ] he Joplin area currently has attainment ...
... Standards for Process Vents ) and of Subpart BB of Part 264 ( Air Emission Standards for Equipment Leaks ) . As for the existing air quality conditions , the permit application states that [ t ] he Joplin area currently has attainment ...
Page 22
... standards promulgated under section 112 ( d ) for sources of pollutants classified as known , probable , or possible carcinogens , do not reduce lifetime cancer risks to the maximum exposed individual to less than " one in one million ...
... standards promulgated under section 112 ( d ) for sources of pollutants classified as known , probable , or possible carcinogens , do not reduce lifetime cancer risks to the maximum exposed individual to less than " one in one million ...
Page 35
... standards , it may be assumed that the omission was deliberate . " Administrator's Decision at 17. Petitioner argues that the assumption is unwarranted , is un- necessary to ensure that States are not forced to accept unwanted EPA ...
... standards , it may be assumed that the omission was deliberate . " Administrator's Decision at 17. Petitioner argues that the assumption is unwarranted , is un- necessary to ensure that States are not forced to accept unwanted EPA ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged EAJA effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego