Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... issue for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.29 . Because the identical issue was under consideration in another case , 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing ) , TSCA Appeal No. 90-3 , the Chief Judicial Officer ...
... issue for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.29 . Because the identical issue was under consideration in another case , 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing ) , TSCA Appeal No. 90-3 , the Chief Judicial Officer ...
Page 12
... issue of whether the permit violates Section 264.601 ( c ) ( 5 ) , petitioners have not carried their bur- den of identifying either a clear factual or legal error or an important policy consideration or exercise of discretion that ...
... issue of whether the permit violates Section 264.601 ( c ) ( 5 ) , petitioners have not carried their bur- den of identifying either a clear factual or legal error or an important policy consideration or exercise of discretion that ...
Page 45
... issue that does not involve a genuine issue of material fact . Accordingly , it is not suitable for an evidentiary hearing . Nevertheless , we must still determine whether , as a legal or policy matter , the issue should be reviewed ...
... issue that does not involve a genuine issue of material fact . Accordingly , it is not suitable for an evidentiary hearing . Nevertheless , we must still determine whether , as a legal or policy matter , the issue should be reviewed ...
Page 46
... issue for review because , although it was raised during the comment pe- riod , MAC did not request an evidentiary hearing on the issue . The Region also argues that a challenge to the permit condition is tanta- mount to a challenge to ...
... issue for review because , although it was raised during the comment pe- riod , MAC did not request an evidentiary hearing on the issue . The Region also argues that a challenge to the permit condition is tanta- mount to a challenge to ...
Page 47
... issue and thus failed to preserve the issue for appeal . See 40 CFR § 124.91 ( a ) ( authorizing appeals of initial decisions or denials of hearing requests ) . Accordingly , review of this issue is denied . Constitutionality of the ...
... issue and thus failed to preserve the issue for appeal . See 40 CFR § 124.91 ( a ) ( authorizing appeals of initial decisions or denials of hearing requests ) . Accordingly , review of this issue is denied . Constitutionality of the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged EAJA effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego