Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 21
... asserts that the incinerator contains state - of - the - art tech- nology , “ is operated by highly trained ... assertion , a capacity limitation of 75,000 tons / year is not necessary to protect public health and the environment . 9 See ...
... asserts that the incinerator contains state - of - the - art tech- nology , “ is operated by highly trained ... assertion , a capacity limitation of 75,000 tons / year is not necessary to protect public health and the environment . 9 See ...
Page 46
... asserts that MAC's real concern appears to be the manner in which the Region might implement the permit condition in the future , and that such concerns do not present an actual controversy ripe for review . ronmental Appeals Board will ...
... asserts that MAC's real concern appears to be the manner in which the Region might implement the permit condition in the future , and that such concerns do not present an actual controversy ripe for review . ronmental Appeals Board will ...
Page 47
... assertion that a permit provision violates the Constitution is not sufficient to warrant review . We conclude that , with ... asserts that " since placer mining is not a petroleum related industry " , it is inappropriate to apply this ...
... assertion that a permit provision violates the Constitution is not sufficient to warrant review . We conclude that , with ... asserts that " since placer mining is not a petroleum related industry " , it is inappropriate to apply this ...
Page 56
... asserts that the United States Attorney's Office concluded , after investigation , that prosecution was not warranted . We did not attempt to confirm this assertion in light of privacy considerations and since we did not rely upon it in ...
... asserts that the United States Attorney's Office concluded , after investigation , that prosecution was not warranted . We did not attempt to confirm this assertion in light of privacy considerations and since we did not rely upon it in ...
Page 65
... asserts that Region V ignored the applicability of this act , notwithstanding that the area is a nesting area for the American Bald Eagle ( a threatened species ) and part of a limited breeding area for the Kirkland Warbler ( an ...
... asserts that Region V ignored the applicability of this act , notwithstanding that the area is a nesting area for the American Bald Eagle ( a threatened species ) and part of a limited breeding area for the Kirkland Warbler ( an ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged EAJA effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego