Science Vs. Religion
Polity, 2007 M10 8 - 179 pages
For centuries, science and religion have been portrayed as diametrically opposed. In this provocative new book, Steve Fuller examines the apparent clash between science and religion by focusing on the heated debates about evolution and intelligent design theory. In so doing, he claims that science vs. religion is in fact a false dichotomy. For Fuller, supposedly intellectual disputes, such as those between creationist and evolutionist accounts of life, often disguise other institutionally driven conflicts, such as the struggle between State and Church to be the source of legitimate authority in society.
Nowadays many conservative anti-science groups support intelligent design theory, but Fuller argues that the theory's theological roots are much more radical, based on the idea that humans were created to fathom the divine plan, perhaps even complete it. He goes on to examine the unique political circumstances in the United States that make the emergence of intelligent design theory so controversial, yet so persistent. Finally, he considers the long-term prognosis, arguing that the future remains very much undecided as society reopens the question of what it means to be human.
This book will appeal to all readers intrigued by the debates about creationism, intelligent design and evolution, especially those looking for an intellectually exciting confrontation with the politics and promise of intelligent design theory.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
20th century animal appear artiﬁcial Bacon believe beneﬁt biological sciences biology Christian complexity conﬂict context contrast creation creationist culture Darwin Darwin’s theory Darwinian Darwinists Dawkins deﬁned deﬁnition deity differences Discovery Institute E. O. Wilson empirical environment evolutionary evolutionary psychology evolutionists ﬁeld ﬁgure ﬁnal ﬁrst ﬁt Fuller function Geddes and Branford genetics God’s Gould history of science human Huxley idea ideological IDT’s inspired intellectual intelligent design intelligent design theorists Julian Huxley Karl Popper Kitzmiller knowledge claims Kuhn’s Lamarck Marxism matter metaphysical Michael Behe modern natural selection neo-Darwinian synthesis neo-Darwinism Newton normative organisms Origin of Species paradigm perhaps philosophers physical political Popper positivists Priestley Priestley’s radical reality reﬂects religious science and religion science’s scientiﬁc scientiﬁc inquiry scientiﬁc method Scientiﬁc Revolution scientiﬁc theory scientists secular sense signiﬁcance simply social sciences sociology speciﬁc Stephen Jay Gould sufﬁciently supernatural theology theory’s tion today’s uniﬁed William Dembski
Page 167 - Davies, P. (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma: Why is the Universe Just Right for Life? London: Allen Lane.
Page 170 - Hacohen, M. (2000). Karl Popper: The Formative Years 1902—1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hahn, R. (2001). Anaximander and the Architects. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Halliday, RJ (1968). "The Sociological Movement, the Sociological Society and the Growth of Academic Sociology," Sociological Review 16: 377—98.