Asian Security Reassessed
This book traces changes in the concept of security in Asia from realist to cooperative, comprehensive, and human security approaches, and assesses a number of policy alternatives to management of both old and new security threats. It surveys not only orthodox security threats such as tensions between regional powers or armed ethnic antagonists but also new sources of anxiety such as resource scarcity, economic instability, irregular migration, community fragmentation, and international terrorism. Security policies of major powers such as China, Japan, and the United States, and the moderating roles of regional organizations such as ASEAN, ARF, SCO, and KEDO are evaluated in historical and contemporary perspectives. Contributors proffer policy-relevant insights where appropriate. The book concludes that traditional security approaches remain valid but need to be adapted to the new challenges, and offers suggestions for incorporating fresh Asian security perceptions into the agendas of policy-makers, analysts, and scholars.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
NonTraditional Challenges to Asian Security
New Concepts of Asian Security
Other editions - View all
Aceh Acehnese agenda agreement American armed ASEAN Regional Forum Asia-Pacific Asia’s Asian countries Asian financial crisis Asian Security Beijing bilateral capital challenges chapter China Chinese Cold War colonial comprehensive security concept conflicts cultural defence democracy diplomacy diplomatic domestic DPRK East Asia East Timor economic edited elite ethnic forces foreign policy framework global public groups human rights human security illegal Indonesia Institute of Southeast international relations Iraq Islamic issues Japan Japanese Jurgen Ruland KEDO leaders liberal major Malaysia migration military Moro multilateral Muslim Myanmar national security North Korea nuclear weapons organizations Pacific Asia peace People’s Philippines political programme proliferation Pyongyang refugees regime regional security role security cooperation security policies Shanghai Cooperation Organization Singapore social South Southeast Asia Southeast Asian Studies stability strategy Suharto Taiwan terrorism terrorist Thailand threats traditional trafficking transnational Treaty United Nations University Press Vietnam Washington Western World
Page 67 - Article 9.Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat 151 or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.
Page 117 - Away, away with all these cobweb tissues of rights of discovery, exploration, settlement, contiguity, etc. . . . The American claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federative self-government entrusted to us.
Page xiv - GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GDP gross domestic product GN'P gross national product...
Page 135 - Thailand are determined to exert initially necessary efforts to secure the recognition of, and respect for, Southeast Asia as a Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality, free from any form or manner of interference by outside Powers...
Page 156 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Page xvi - UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme...
Page 15 - ... emphasises reassurance rather than deterrence: is inclusive rather than exclusive: is not restrictive in membership; favours multilateralism over bilateralism; does not privilege military solutions over non-military ones; assumes that states are the principal actors in the security system. but accepts that nonstate actors have an important role to play: does not require the creation of formal security institutions.
Page 294 - Albania has also ratified the major international human rights instruments, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights...