Asian Security Reassessed

Front Cover
Stephen Hoadley, Jurgen Ruland
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006 - 381 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
This book traces changes in the concept of security in Asia from realist to cooperative, comprehensive, and human security approaches, and assesses a number of policy alternatives to management of both old and new security threats. It surveys not only orthodox security threats such as tensions between regional powers or armed ethnic antagonists but also new sources of anxiety such as resource scarcity, economic instability, irregular migration, community fragmentation, and international terrorism. Security policies of major powers such as China, Japan, and the United States, and the moderating roles of regional organizations such as ASEAN, ARF, SCO, and KEDO are evaluated in historical and contemporary perspectives. Contributors proffer policy-relevant insights where appropriate. The book concludes that traditional security approaches remain valid but need to be adapted to the new challenges, and offers suggestions for incorporating fresh Asian security perceptions into the agendas of policy-makers, analysts, and scholars.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Security Management by Asian States and Regional Institutions
35
NonTraditional Challenges to Asian Security
169
New Concepts of Asian Security
309
Index
369
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 67 - Article 9.Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat 151 or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.
Page 117 - Away, away with all these cobweb tissues of rights of discovery, exploration, settlement, contiguity, etc. . . . The American claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federative self-government entrusted to us.
Page xiv - GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GDP gross domestic product GN'P gross national product...
Page 135 - Thailand are determined to exert initially necessary efforts to secure the recognition of, and respect for, Southeast Asia as a Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality, free from any form or manner of interference by outside Powers...
Page 156 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Page xvi - UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme...
Page 15 - ... emphasises reassurance rather than deterrence: is inclusive rather than exclusive: is not restrictive in membership; favours multilateralism over bilateralism; does not privilege military solutions over non-military ones; assumes that states are the principal actors in the security system. but accepts that nonstate actors have an important role to play: does not require the creation of formal security institutions.
Page 294 - Albania has also ratified the major international human rights instruments, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights...

About the author (2006)

• Stephen Hoadley is Associate Professor of Political Studies at the University of Auckland. He is Senior Fellow of the Centre for Strategic Studies, Victoria University.

• Jürgen Rüland is Professor of Political Science at the University of Freiburg, and Director of the Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institute for Social Research, Freiburg, Germany. 

Bibliographic information