TABLE I.-Fryingpan-Arkansas project-Summary of benefit-cost analysis 1 Interest during construction computations appearing in report have been reanalyzed; realistic construction periods were set up by features and made consistent with development periods. 2 Annual cost of regulation provided by Upper Colorado River Storage Project at $2.35 per acre-foot. 3 Adjusted to 215 agricultural price index; excludes interest and wages shown in report as direct benefits to others; indirect benefits reflect increased marketing and processing activities and increases in farm purchases. • Benefits reflect prospective value of power in area. Adjusted to reflect projected prices, Engineering News-Record Index of 180 (1939-100). FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT TABLE IA.-Summary of benefit-cost analysis by functions 1 These amounts represent the costs of enlargement of the collection and diversion system specifically for fish and wildlife purposes. They are shown as specific costs because the allocation to this function is limited to the costs of these added facilities totaling $2,830,000, as described in report of the regional director for mitigation of losses, 1 Incremental costs of features on western slope, as described in report of the regional director for mitigation of losses. TABLE, IV.-Interest during construction TABLE IV.—Interest during construction—Continued Feature Pancho (Princeton) powerplant, 15,000 kilowatts. Salida powerplant, 22,700 kilowatts Pueblo powerplant, 11,000 kilowatts. Dillon-Elbert, 51 miles.. Elbert-Otero, 11 miles. Otero-Wapaco, 7 miles. Wapaco-Princeton, 15 miles. Princeton-Pancho, 7 miles. Pancho-Salida, 3 miles. Gunnison-Salida, 66 miles. Saguache-Salida, 47 miles. Pueblo-Colorado Springs, 44 miles.. Colorado Springs, 30,000 kilovolt-amperes. Otero, 21,330 kilovolt-amperes. Wapaco, 18,330 kilovolt-amperes. Princeton, 13,000 kilovolt-amperes. Pancho, 16,670 kilovolt-amperes. Salida, 25,220 kilovolt-amperes. Pueblo, 12,220 kilovolt-amperes. General communication system. J=Joint ($4,691,000); P=Power ($1,212,500); M=Municipal water ($690,000). Breakdown of the interest during construction to the allocated use of the The distribution of the joint interest during construction was made to the various functions by the same percentages that the functions share in the joint construction costs. This distribution is as follows: The total reimbursable amounts of interest during construction are Power.... Municipal water_. 464, 000 849, 000 118,000 4, 691, 000 $1, 213, 000+$117, 000= $1, 330, 000 $690,000+ $464, 000: 1, 154, 000 Total__ The nonreimbursable interest during construction is $4,110,000. = 2, 484, 000 |