A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972: A legislative history of the Water pollution control act amendments of 1972U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 293
... percent of the cost for sewage treatment facilities . The maximum would be 70 per- cent if a State contributed 10 percent of the cost . House amendment Section 202 ( a ) increases the Federal share of waste treatment facilities to a ...
... percent of the cost for sewage treatment facilities . The maximum would be 70 per- cent if a State contributed 10 percent of the cost . House amendment Section 202 ( a ) increases the Federal share of waste treatment facilities to a ...
Page 373
... percent or 75 percent Federal share , whichever is applicable . Treatment works " E " was put into construction prior to July 1 , 1971. The . project was approved by the Administrator prior to the enactment of this legis- lation , and ...
... percent or 75 percent Federal share , whichever is applicable . Treatment works " E " was put into construction prior to July 1 , 1971. The . project was approved by the Administrator prior to the enactment of this legis- lation , and ...
Page 441
... percent of the projected 1990 municipal flows . ( b ) 100 percent of the projected 1990 industrial flows . ( c ) 50 percent of the urban runoff ( storm water ) .. gallons per day 2,076 300 Capital costs ( millions ) . $ 3,642.00 $ 2,987 ...
... percent of the projected 1990 municipal flows . ( b ) 100 percent of the projected 1990 industrial flows . ( c ) 50 percent of the urban runoff ( storm water ) .. gallons per day 2,076 300 Capital costs ( millions ) . $ 3,642.00 $ 2,987 ...
Contents
Public Law 92500 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Page | 11 |
House debate_ | 95 |
Senate debate__ | 115 |
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abatement achieve action Administrator amendment offered Amendments of 1972 application appropriate approved best available best available technology billion Chairman clean water conference report Conference substitute Congress construction Control Act Amendments cost determined discharge of pollutants disposal economic effect effluent limitations elimination enforcement environment Environmental Financing Environmental Protection Agency established Federal Government Federal share Federal Water Pollution fiscal funds gentleman goal grants guidelines Harsha House bill industrial users issued June 30 Lake Lake Erie Lake Tahoe legislation ment municipal municipal waste navigable waters NEPA October 18 operation percent permit program plans point sources Pollution Control Act President problem projects proposed Public Works Committee pursuant Refuse Act regulations reimbursement requirements river section 402 Senate bill sewage sewage treatment source performance standards subsection thermal discharges tion treatment plants veto violation vote waste treatment management Water Pollution Control water quality standards zero discharge