A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972: A legislative history of the Water pollution control act amendments of 1972U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 90
Page 195
... impact statement . ( 1 ) No NEPA impact statement would be required for EPA approval of regional water quality management plans , even though under EPA's current procedures environmental impact statements are prepared for such plans ...
... impact statement . ( 1 ) No NEPA impact statement would be required for EPA approval of regional water quality management plans , even though under EPA's current procedures environmental impact statements are prepared for such plans ...
Page 204
... impact statement on dis- charge permits which are to be based on performance standards which themselves will not be the subject of an impact statement and which , under section 511 ( c ) ( 2 ) , would not be subject to any reexamination ...
... impact statement on dis- charge permits which are to be based on performance standards which themselves will not be the subject of an impact statement and which , under section 511 ( c ) ( 2 ) , would not be subject to any reexamination ...
Page 538
... impact statement in so wide a variety of cases as section 511 ( d ) does . Mr. WRIGHT . Mr. Chairman , I rise in opposition to the amendment . The amendment has primary application to the Atomic Energy Com- mission . This language was ...
... impact statement in so wide a variety of cases as section 511 ( d ) does . Mr. WRIGHT . Mr. Chairman , I rise in opposition to the amendment . The amendment has primary application to the Atomic Energy Com- mission . This language was ...
Contents
Public Law 92500 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Page | 11 |
House debate_ | 95 |
Senate debate__ | 115 |
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abatement achieve action Administrator amendment offered Amendments of 1972 application appropriate approved best available best available technology billion Chairman clean water conference report Conference substitute Congress construction Control Act Amendments cost determined discharge of pollutants disposal economic effect effluent limitations elimination enforcement environment Environmental Financing Environmental Protection Agency established Federal Government Federal share Federal Water Pollution fiscal funds gentleman goal grants guidelines Harsha House bill industrial users issued June 30 Lake Lake Erie Lake Tahoe legislation ment municipal municipal waste navigable waters NEPA October 18 operation percent permit program plans point sources Pollution Control Act President problem projects proposed Public Works Committee pursuant Refuse Act regulations reimbursement requirements river section 402 Senate bill sewage sewage treatment source performance standards subsection thermal discharges tion treatment plants veto violation vote waste treatment management Water Pollution Control water quality standards zero discharge