To Provide for Additional Protection of Steelhead Trout as a Game Fish: Hearing Before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 954 ... July 11, 1985, Washington, DC.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 451 pages |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
anadromous fish bill Boldt Decision Bonneville Bonneville Dam Chairman coho coho salmon commercial fishery commercial steelhead conservation cooperation CRITFC Department of Fish Department of Game Deschutes River economic enhancement federal court Fish and Game Fish and Wildlife fisheries management fishing for steelhead Game Department game fish gillnet habitat hatchery hatchery fish IDFG Indian Affairs Indian fishermen Indian treaty rights Indian tribes legislation license Lower Granite Dam Nisqually River non-Indian Oregon Pacific Northwest Pahsimeroi Pahsimeroi River Puyallup Puyallup Tribe Quinault recreational regulations released reservation River system salmon and steelhead Salmon River steelhead SAMISH RIVER season Senator GORTON Skagit River smolts Snake River spawning escapement species sport catch sport fishermen sport fishery sport fishing sportsmen statement steelhead decommercialization steelhead fishery steelhead fishing steelhead resource steelhead runs steelhead trout Supreme Court treaty fishing rights treaty Indian treaty tribes United USFWS Warm Springs Washington Washington Department wild fish wild steelhead
Popular passages
Page 166 - That all noncitizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the United States: Provided, That the granting of such citizenship shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of any Indian to tribal or other property.
Page 185 - The power exists to abrogate the provisions of an Indian treaty, though presumably such power will be exercised only when circumstances arise which will not only justify the government in disregarding the stipulations of the treaty, but may demand, in the interest of the country and the Indians themselves, that it should do so.
Page 104 - In other words, the treaty was not a grant of rights to the Indians, but a grant of rights from them - a reservation of those not granted.
Page 166 - The Congress declares that a major national goal of the United States is to provide the quantity and quality of educational services and opportunities which will permit Indian children to compete and excel in the life areas of their choice, and to achieve the measure of self-determination essential to their social and economic well-being. .. . § 450b. Definitions For the purposes of this Act, the term— (a) "Indian...
Page 166 - The Congress declares its commitment to the maintenance of the Federal Government's unique and continuing relationship with and responsibility to the Indian people through the establishment of a meaningful Indian self-determination policy which will permit an orderly transition from Federal domination of programs for and services to Indians to effective and meaningful participation by the Indian people in the planning, conduct, and administration of those programs and services.
Page 103 - The right of taking fish at usual and accustomed grounds and stations is further secured to said Indians, in common with all citizens of the United States...
Page 165 - The Congress hereby recognizes the obligation of the United States to respond to the strong expression of the Indian people for self-determination by assuring maximum Indian participation in the direction of educational as well as other Federal services to Indian communities so as to render such services more responsive to the needs and desires of those communities.
Page 165 - Indian people and their communities by depriving Indians of the full opportunity to develop leadership skills crucial to the realization of self-government, and has denied to the Indian people an effective voice in the planning and implementation of programs for the benefit of Indians which are responsive to the true needs of Indian communities; and (2) the Indian people will never surrender their desire to control their relationships both among themselves and with non-Indian governments, organizations,...
Page 165 - Indian people, finds that — (1) the prolonged Federal domination of Indian service programs has served to retard rather than enhance the progress of Indian people and their communities by depriving Indians of the full opportunity to develop leadership skills crucial to the realization of selfgovernment, and has denied to the Indian people an effective voice in the planning and implementation of programs...
Page 106 - For notwithstanding the bitterness that this litigation has engendered, the principal issue involved is virtually a "matter decided" by our previous holdings. The Court has interpreted the fishing clause in these treaties on six prior occasions. In all of these cases the Court placed a relatively broad gloss on the Indians...