Clinton and Post-Cold War Defense
The experts raise many provocative questions and varying conclusions about the problems and prospects for the United States and for the post-Cold War era. Advanced undergraduate and graduate students and teachers should find that this hard-hitting analysis stimulates discussion, and military experts and policymakers should find this of real interest also. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 23
In general , according to Arkin and Mazarr , the Clinton nuclear review ducked the most important questions about the role of nuclear weapons in the new world order because it lacked a long - term vision of its nuclear policy objectives ...
Most would agree with Brady that the Clinton administration successfully achieved the first political objective of alliance management in the post - Cold War world : at least , do no harm . NATO continues to skate figure eights around ...
The " American way of war " emphasizing the moral high ground , clear objectives , short - duration wars , clearly defined adversaries , and discrete beginnings and endings to fighting is potentially ill - suited to success in ...
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
What people are saying - Write a review
Contents
1 | |
Defense Budgets and the Clinton Defense Program | 15 |
Defense Planning for the PostCold War Era Bush Clinton and Beyond | 29 |
Clinton Defense Policy and Nuclear Weapons | 49 |
Working with Allies Clinton Defense Policy and the Management of Multilateralism | 71 |
Peacekeeping Peace Enforcement and Clinton Defense Policy | 87 |
Special Operations LowIntensity Conflict Unconventional Conflicts and the Clinton Defense Strategy | 103 |
Clinton Defense PolicyMaking Players Process and Policiesr | 123 |
CivilMilitary Relations After the Cold War Integrating the Armed Forces and American Society | 139 |
Clinton and US Peacekeeping | 153 |
Conclusions | 169 |
Selected Bibliography | 183 |
Index | 187 |
About the Contributors | 194 |