Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 49
... rules do not require the permit issuer to invite public comment on such new information added to the record after the ... rule will not necessarily invalidate the rulemaking ) ; accord Pension Ben . Guar . Corp. v . LTV Corp. , 496 U.S. ...
... rules do not require the permit issuer to invite public comment on such new information added to the record after the ... rule will not necessarily invalidate the rulemaking ) ; accord Pension Ben . Guar . Corp. v . LTV Corp. , 496 U.S. ...
Page 64
... Rule to the effect that " a NOx limit of 0.04 lb / MMBtu was being achieved at a power plant in Texas , " Petition at 102 ( citing Standards of Performance for Elec- tric Utility Steam Generating Units for Which Construction Is ...
... Rule to the effect that " a NOx limit of 0.04 lb / MMBtu was being achieved at a power plant in Texas , " Petition at 102 ( citing Standards of Performance for Elec- tric Utility Steam Generating Units for Which Construction Is ...
Page 65
... rule that had been published in the Federal Register after the close of the public comment period . Petitioners , however , are mistaken in their contention that application of these policy memoranda and precedent from the Administrator ...
... rule that had been published in the Federal Register after the close of the public comment period . Petitioners , however , are mistaken in their contention that application of these policy memoranda and precedent from the Administrator ...
Page 69
... rule change are at most superficial . In St. Lawrence County , the Administrator specifi- cally noted that the proposed rule would apply retroactively73 and the final permit " sets less stringent emission levels for NOx , SO2 , and CO ...
... rule change are at most superficial . In St. Lawrence County , the Administrator specifi- cally noted that the proposed rule would apply retroactively73 and the final permit " sets less stringent emission levels for NOx , SO2 , and CO ...
Page 70
... Rule's preamble regarding the Texas facility upon which the Petitioners rely , unlike the proposed rulemaking in St. Lawrence County , does not constitute a preliminary Agency determination that limits more stringent than set forth in ...
... Rule's preamble regarding the Texas facility upon which the Petitioners rely , unlike the proposed rulemaking in St. Lawrence County , does not constitute a preliminary Agency determination that limits more stringent than set forth in ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards