Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... record generally do not require the issuer of an EPA permit to supplement the record with informa- tion submitted by the public after the close of the public comment period . Although there are circumstances in which significant new ...
... record generally do not require the issuer of an EPA permit to supplement the record with informa- tion submitted by the public after the close of the public comment period . Although there are circumstances in which significant new ...
Page 36
... record evidence shows that IGCC's achievable con- trol effectiveness , at this time , is similar to the control alternatives Prairie State proposed as BACT and selected as the top alternative . In particular , IEPA stated that " [ a ] ...
... record evidence shows that IGCC's achievable con- trol effectiveness , at this time , is similar to the control alternatives Prairie State proposed as BACT and selected as the top alternative . In particular , IEPA stated that " [ a ] ...
Page 41
... record evidence of coal washing's minimal benefits and extensive impacts . In par- ticular , Petitioners have not shown any clear error in IEPA's determinations that " coal washing will at most provide a very small additional reduction ...
... record evidence of coal washing's minimal benefits and extensive impacts . In par- ticular , Petitioners have not shown any clear error in IEPA's determinations that " coal washing will at most provide a very small additional reduction ...
Page 45
... record or otherwise , 41 showing that IEPA's concern regarding increasing emis- sions of both PM and other pollutants as a result of the energy penalty is errone- ous . In this regard , we note that the Agency made a finding under the ...
... record or otherwise , 41 showing that IEPA's concern regarding increasing emis- sions of both PM and other pollutants as a result of the energy penalty is errone- ous . In this regard , we note that the Agency made a finding under the ...
Page 46
... record at some time after March 2005. Id . at 6.44 Petitioners state that the administrative record contained a copy of an e - mail from IEPA to Prairie State stating that the issue was raised in a draft biological opinion prepared by ...
... record at some time after March 2005. Id . at 6.44 Petitioners state that the administrative record contained a copy of an e - mail from IEPA to Prairie State stating that the issue was raised in a draft biological opinion prepared by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards