Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 6
... present in the atmosphere at any time is nitrogen dioxides . Com- bustion sources emit mostly nitric oxide , with some nitrogen dioxides . Composition sources emit mostly nitric oxide , with some nitrogen dioxide . Upon entering the ...
... present in the atmosphere at any time is nitrogen dioxides . Com- bustion sources emit mostly nitric oxide , with some nitrogen dioxides . Composition sources emit mostly nitric oxide , with some nitrogen dioxide . Upon entering the ...
Page 8
... present case , Petitioners argue that the air quality and source impacts analysis failed to consider the proposed Facility's impact on com- pliance with the 8 - hour ozone NAAQS , contained an erroneous analysis of the impact on the 1 ...
... present case , Petitioners argue that the air quality and source impacts analysis failed to consider the proposed Facility's impact on com- pliance with the 8 - hour ozone NAAQS , contained an erroneous analysis of the impact on the 1 ...
Page 9
... present petition for review . On the same day , April 28 , 2005 , IEPA issued a revised response to the comments received from the public . See Responsiveness Summary for Public Questions and Comments on the Construction Permit Appli ...
... present petition for review . On the same day , April 28 , 2005 , IEPA issued a revised response to the comments received from the public . See Responsiveness Summary for Public Questions and Comments on the Construction Permit Appli ...
Page 15
... present case , Petitioners argue that IEPA's BACT determination is fatally flawed because it did not identify in the first step , and therefore improperly excluded from BACT consideration , several control alternatives that Petitioners ...
... present case , Petitioners argue that IEPA's BACT determination is fatally flawed because it did not identify in the first step , and therefore improperly excluded from BACT consideration , several control alternatives that Petitioners ...
Page 27
... present case , we are satisfied that IEPA took a sufficiently hard look at Prairie State's proposed Facility design to determine whether further emissions reductions would be achievable through inherently lower - polluting processes or ...
... present case , we are satisfied that IEPA took a sufficiently hard look at Prairie State's proposed Facility design to determine whether further emissions reductions would be achievable through inherently lower - polluting processes or ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards