Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 43
... period of time . Specifi- cally , the authorization is limited to an interruption " caused by events or circum- stances that could not be reasonably prevented " by Prairie State and it must be a longer interruption than routinely occurs ...
... period of time . Specifi- cally , the authorization is limited to an interruption " caused by events or circum- stances that could not be reasonably prevented " by Prairie State and it must be a longer interruption than routinely occurs ...
Page 47
... period , and we find no error in IEPA's failure to do so . Petition at 5 . Petitioners ' argument that the permit is deficient on the grounds that it alleg- edly does not provide " reasonable protections for the endangered toad " is in ...
... period , and we find no error in IEPA's failure to do so . Petition at 5 . Petitioners ' argument that the permit is deficient on the grounds that it alleg- edly does not provide " reasonable protections for the endangered toad " is in ...
Page 48
... period is a matter generally left to the permit issuer's dis- cretion when the information raises " substantial new questions concerning the per- mit " and reopening the public comment period could expedite the decisionmaking process ...
... period is a matter generally left to the permit issuer's dis- cretion when the information raises " substantial new questions concerning the per- mit " and reopening the public comment period could expedite the decisionmaking process ...
Page 49
... period . " ) ; accord In re St. Lawrence County Solid Waste Disposal Auth . , PSD Appeal No. 90-9 , at 3 n.3 ( Adm'r July 27 , 1990 ) ( " The close of the public comment period is an appropriate benchmark for closing the admin ...
... period . " ) ; accord In re St. Lawrence County Solid Waste Disposal Auth . , PSD Appeal No. 90-9 , at 3 n.3 ( Adm'r July 27 , 1990 ) ( " The close of the public comment period is an appropriate benchmark for closing the admin ...
Page 57
... period persuaded IEPA to add the 98 % con- trol efficiency limit56 to ensure that Prairie State consistently maintains and oper- ates the WFGD system in order to achieve the control efficiency contemplated by IEPA's analysis of the ...
... period persuaded IEPA to add the 98 % con- trol efficiency limit56 to ensure that Prairie State consistently maintains and oper- ates the WFGD system in order to achieve the control efficiency contemplated by IEPA's analysis of the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards