Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 4
... notice to the FLM that complies with 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 1 ) and the FLM does not make an adverse impact determination and provide such determination to the permit issuer in the time frame specified in 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 3 ) ...
... notice to the FLM that complies with 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 1 ) and the FLM does not make an adverse impact determination and provide such determination to the permit issuer in the time frame specified in 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 3 ) ...
Page 8
... notice to the public inviting comment on the draft permit between February 6 , 2004 , and April 21 , 2004. The public comment period was subse- quently extended through August 27 , 2004. IEPA also held a public hearing on March 22 ...
... notice to the public inviting comment on the draft permit between February 6 , 2004 , and April 21 , 2004. The public comment period was subse- quently extended through August 27 , 2004. IEPA also held a public hearing on March 22 ...
Page 47
... notice to the public and protection of the Eastern Narrow Mouth Toad . As to their substantive claim , Petitioners fail to demonstrate how IEPA erred in its BACT analysis of the proposed control tech- nology's " significant or unusual ...
... notice to the public and protection of the Eastern Narrow Mouth Toad . As to their substantive claim , Petitioners fail to demonstrate how IEPA erred in its BACT analysis of the proposed control tech- nology's " significant or unusual ...
Page 48
... notice of IDNR's biological opinion is also unpersuasive . Peti- tioners never articulate the test for determining whether the public comment pe- riod should be reopened to provide notice for new information arising following the close ...
... notice of IDNR's biological opinion is also unpersuasive . Peti- tioners never articulate the test for determining whether the public comment pe- riod should be reopened to provide notice for new information arising following the close ...
Page 112
... notice IEPA provided did not comply with 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 3 ) . Id . As explained below , we disagree with Petitioners ' interpreta- tion of the applicable regulations . Petitioners are mistaken that public notice provided by ...
... notice IEPA provided did not comply with 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 ( p ) ( 3 ) . Id . As explained below , we disagree with Petitioners ' interpreta- tion of the applicable regulations . Petitioners are mistaken that public notice provided by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards