Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... failing to perform a separate BACT analysis for sulfuric acid mist distinct from the BACT analysis for SO2 emissions . Petitioners have failed to point to evidence of error in the permitting authority's analytic meth- odology , which is ...
... failing to perform a separate BACT analysis for sulfuric acid mist distinct from the BACT analysis for SO2 emissions . Petitioners have failed to point to evidence of error in the permitting authority's analytic meth- odology , which is ...
Page 4
... failed to adequately notify the public of the adverse impact finding made by the federal land manager ( " FLM " ) responsible for the Mingo Class I area . Where the permit issuer provides notice to the FLM that complies with 40 C.F.R. ...
... failed to adequately notify the public of the adverse impact finding made by the federal land manager ( " FLM " ) responsible for the Mingo Class I area . Where the permit issuer provides notice to the FLM that complies with 40 C.F.R. ...
Page 42
... failed to challenge IEPA's conclusion that benefits cannot be assumed to occur , and further , Petitioners have not disputed IEPA's specific findings regarding the significant additional facilities and equipment that would be required ...
... failed to challenge IEPA's conclusion that benefits cannot be assumed to occur , and further , Petitioners have not disputed IEPA's specific findings regarding the significant additional facilities and equipment that would be required ...
Page 56
... failed to consider higher SO2 control efficiency limits that Petitioners contend could be achieved through use of several specific variations or enhancements to WFGD technology . Petition at 56-63 . Petitioners argue that IEPA failed to ...
... failed to consider higher SO2 control efficiency limits that Petitioners contend could be achieved through use of several specific variations or enhancements to WFGD technology . Petition at 56-63 . Petitioners argue that IEPA failed to ...
Page 57
... failed to evaluate or even consider " these WFGD variations , Petition at 57 , however , must be rejected for the simple reason that IEPA did in fact consider WFGD technological variations and performance data when establishing the SO2 ...
... failed to evaluate or even consider " these WFGD variations , Petition at 57 , however , must be rejected for the simple reason that IEPA did in fact consider WFGD technological variations and performance data when establishing the SO2 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards