Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 16
... explained its reasoning as follows : With respect to alternate sources of coal , e.g. , low - sulfur western coal from Wyoming or Montana , the proposed plant is being designed and developed to burn high - sulfur Illinois coal , the ...
... explained its reasoning as follows : With respect to alternate sources of coal , e.g. , low - sulfur western coal from Wyoming or Montana , the proposed plant is being designed and developed to burn high - sulfur Illinois coal , the ...
Page 26
... explained that the permit issuer's failure to take a sufficiently hard look at the design issues had the " potential to circumvent the purpose of BACT , which is to promote use of the best control technologies as widely as possible ...
... explained that the permit issuer's failure to take a sufficiently hard look at the design issues had the " potential to circumvent the purpose of BACT , which is to promote use of the best control technologies as widely as possible ...
Page 31
... explained that Prairie State's proposed Facility is intended to be operated " at its full capacity for up to 24 - hours each day . " Response to Comments at 16. IEPA explained that " a wind power plant would not be a substitute for the ...
... explained that Prairie State's proposed Facility is intended to be operated " at its full capacity for up to 24 - hours each day . " Response to Comments at 16. IEPA explained that " a wind power plant would not be a substitute for the ...
Page 57
... explained or justified its use of " safety factors " in setting the 98 % control efficiency limit . Id . at 47 . Petitioners ' argument that IEPA " failed to evaluate or even consider " these WFGD variations , Petition at 57 , however ...
... explained or justified its use of " safety factors " in setting the 98 % control efficiency limit . Id . at 47 . Petitioners ' argument that IEPA " failed to evaluate or even consider " these WFGD variations , Petition at 57 , however ...
Page 75
... explaining why stack testing should not be the sole indicator of emission control technology performance . In particular , IEPA explained that stack tests " are conducted under operating conditions of emission units that place the ...
... explaining why stack testing should not be the sole indicator of emission control technology performance . In particular , IEPA explained that stack tests " are conducted under operating conditions of emission units that place the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards