Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . The Board rejects Petitioners contention that IEPA failed to provide notice to the public and to adequately consider the Petitioners ' concern ...
... evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . The Board rejects Petitioners contention that IEPA failed to provide notice to the public and to adequately consider the Petitioners ' concern ...
Page 41
... evidence of coal washing's minimal benefits and extensive impacts . In par- ticular , Petitioners have not shown any clear error in IEPA's determinations that " coal washing will at most provide a very small additional reduction in SO2 ...
... evidence of coal washing's minimal benefits and extensive impacts . In par- ticular , Petitioners have not shown any clear error in IEPA's determinations that " coal washing will at most provide a very small additional reduction in SO2 ...
Page 45
... evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . Petitioners have not directed us to any evidence , in the record or otherwise , 41 showing that IEPA's concern regarding increasing emis- sions ...
... evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . Petitioners have not directed us to any evidence , in the record or otherwise , 41 showing that IEPA's concern regarding increasing emis- sions ...
Page 48
... evidence upon which the fi- nal permit decision is to be based.49 That process includes a time - gap for evalua- tion of the evidence during which the permit issuer generally is not required to consider new information received after ...
... evidence upon which the fi- nal permit decision is to be based.49 That process includes a time - gap for evalua- tion of the evidence during which the permit issuer generally is not required to consider new information received after ...
Page 50
... evidence . This is simply not a sufficient basis for introducing further delay in issuing the Permit at this late stage in the administrative decisionmaking process . Thus , we reject Petitioners contention that public comment must be ...
... evidence . This is simply not a sufficient basis for introducing further delay in issuing the Permit at this late stage in the administrative decisionmaking process . Thus , we reject Petitioners contention that public comment must be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards