Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 278
... counts . First , the Regions alleged that Howmet shipped hazardous waste to facilities that did not have an EPA ... count in its original Complaint , it did not include it in its First Amended Complaint . 22 The ALJ initially had ...
... counts . First , the Regions alleged that Howmet shipped hazardous waste to facilities that did not have an EPA ... count in its original Complaint , it did not include it in its First Amended Complaint . 22 The ALJ initially had ...
Page 332
... ( Count III ) ; and ( 4 ) failing to dispose of all waste material containing asbestos as soon as practical ( Count IV ) . Relying on the Agency's civil penalty policies relevant to asbestos demolition , the Region proposed a total ...
... ( Count III ) ; and ( 4 ) failing to dispose of all waste material containing asbestos as soon as practical ( Count IV ) . Relying on the Agency's civil penalty policies relevant to asbestos demolition , the Region proposed a total ...
Page 333
... Counts II , III and IV . The penalties for Counts II and IV are assessed jointly against all three Respondents . The pen- alty for Count III is assessed jointly against the City and Popple . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Scott C ...
... Counts II , III and IV . The penalties for Counts II and IV are assessed jointly against all three Respondents . The pen- alty for Count III is assessed jointly against the City and Popple . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Scott C ...
Page 334
... Count I , but concluded that the Region had proven the violations in Counts II , III , and IV . Notably , the ALJ dismissed Count III as to Wyoming , finding that only Popple and the City should be held liable for that count . All three ...
... Count I , but concluded that the Region had proven the violations in Counts II , III , and IV . Notably , the ALJ dismissed Count III as to Wyoming , finding that only Popple and the City should be held liable for that count . All three ...
Page 341
... Count I of its Complaint , the Region alleged that the Respondents violated the asbestos NESHAP by failing to provide adequate notice of the demolition in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.145 ( b ) . Compl . ¶¶ 56-59 , 61 , at 9-10 . Count ...
... Count I of its Complaint , the Region alleged that the Respondents violated the asbestos NESHAP by failing to provide adequate notice of the demolition in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 61.145 ( b ) . Compl . ¶¶ 56-59 , 61 , at 9-10 . Count ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards