Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... considered in finaliz- ing a permit's terms , Petitioners have not demonstrated how the post - comment pe- riod information upon which they rely is sufficiently significant to call into question IEPA's permit limit . IEPA did consider ...
... considered in finaliz- ing a permit's terms , Petitioners have not demonstrated how the post - comment pe- riod information upon which they rely is sufficiently significant to call into question IEPA's permit limit . IEPA did consider ...
Page 4
... considered in connection with the issuance of PSD permits by both the Regions and states acting under delegated authority . The Board rejects Petitioners contention that IEPA failed to adequately consider the en- vironmental justice ...
... considered in connection with the issuance of PSD permits by both the Regions and states acting under delegated authority . The Board rejects Petitioners contention that IEPA failed to adequately consider the en- vironmental justice ...
Page 14
... considered and the top alternative is either confirmed as appropriate or is determined to be inappropriate . Id . at B.29 . Issues regarding the cost effec- tiveness of the alternative technologies are considered under step 4. Id . at B ...
... considered and the top alternative is either confirmed as appropriate or is determined to be inappropriate . Id . at B.29 . Issues regarding the cost effec- tiveness of the alternative technologies are considered under step 4. Id . at B ...
Page 17
... considered as a means of achieving emissions reductions . Id . Petitioners also ar- gue that IEPA's application of the " clean fuels " requirement is contrary to prior Board and Administrator decisions interpreting the statutory text ...
... considered as a means of achieving emissions reductions . Id . Petitioners also ar- gue that IEPA's application of the " clean fuels " requirement is contrary to prior Board and Administrator decisions interpreting the statutory text ...
Page 18
... considered other alternative coal supplies for the proposed plant , " but rejected " [ a ] more detailed analysis of alternative coal sup- plies " on the grounds that " it was beyond the scope of the project , a power plant fueled from ...
... considered other alternative coal supplies for the proposed plant , " but rejected " [ a ] more detailed analysis of alternative coal sup- plies " on the grounds that " it was beyond the scope of the project , a power plant fueled from ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards