Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 13U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... Petitioners " ) request review of a prevention of significant deterioration ( " PSD " ) permit ( " Permit " ) that the Illi- nois Environmental Protection Agency ( " IEPA " ) issued to Prairie State Generating Com- pany , LLC ...
... Petitioners " ) request review of a prevention of significant deterioration ( " PSD " ) permit ( " Permit " ) that the Illi- nois Environmental Protection Agency ( " IEPA " ) issued to Prairie State Generating Com- pany , LLC ...
Page 2
... Petitioners have not taken the additional step that they are required to take , which is to put before the Board evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . The Board rejects Petitioners ...
... Petitioners have not taken the additional step that they are required to take , which is to put before the Board evidence that the facts are contrary to the reasoning stated in IEPA's narrative analysis . The Board rejects Petitioners ...
Page 3
... Petitioners ' contention that IEPA should have " updated " its NOx BACT determination to take into account new information submitted after the close of public comment . The regulations governing the administrative record generally do ...
... Petitioners ' contention that IEPA should have " updated " its NOx BACT determination to take into account new information submitted after the close of public comment . The regulations governing the administrative record generally do ...
Page 8
... Petitioners ' representatives testified . See Transcript of Hearing at 2 ( Mar. 22 , 2004 ) . Petitioners also submitted extensive written com- ments on the draft permit . See Letter from Robert Ukeiley , Counsel for Sierra Club , Clean ...
... Petitioners ' representatives testified . See Transcript of Hearing at 2 ( Mar. 22 , 2004 ) . Petitioners also submitted extensive written com- ments on the draft permit . See Letter from Robert Ukeiley , Counsel for Sierra Club , Clean ...
Page 11
... Petitioners do not take exception to the technology specified by IEPA for the control of the Facility's regulated pollutants . However , Petitioners do raise procedural and substantive objections to IEPA's BACT analyses , begin- ning ...
... Petitioners do not take exception to the technology specified by IEPA for the control of the Facility's regulated pollutants . However , Petitioners do raise procedural and substantive objections to IEPA's BACT analyses , begin- ning ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Agency Agency's air quality ALJ's alleged appeal application argument asbestos BACT analysis BACT limits Board Brief capacitors Christian County citing clear error coal compliance schedule concluded ConocoPhillips considered count D.C. Cir determination draft permit effluent limits emissions limits enforcement Environmental EPA's EPS's Euclid explained failed federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous waste Howmet IEPA IEPA's IEPA's response impacts Indeck Init Initial Decision issue LTCP major stationary source Martex ment monitoring NAAQS NPDES NPDES permit NSR Manual OCS source PCB waste Penalty Policy permit decision permit issuer pesticide Petition Petitioners argue pollutant Prairie State's proposed Facility protection PSD permit public comment period RCRA record Region regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Sierra Club SMRO specifically spent material tion U.S. EPA violations WASA water quality standards