EXECUTIVE SUMMARY American National Standard Committee A58 periodically issues revisions to ANSI Standard A58 "Building Code Requirements for Minimum Design Loads in Buildings and Other Structures." This document defines magnitudes of dead, live, wind, snow and earthquake loads suitable for inclusion in building codes and other regulatory documents. The A58 Standard Committee is a broad-spectrum group of professionals from the research community, building code groups, industry, professional organizations and trade associations. Their approval of a proposed standard signifies that a consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions has been reached, in that affected parties have had an opportunity to comment on the standard prior to its implementation and opposing points of view have been treated fairly. The A58 Standard is concerned solely with structural load ings. The specification of specific allowable stresses or design strengths for materials of construction is outside its scope. The current version of the A58 Standard, ANSI A58.1-1972, is being revised, with a tentative approval and publication date set for 1980. This report addresses itself to changes to the A58 Standard which may occur subsequent to the 1980 revision. Its purpose is to develop a load criterion, including load factors and load combinations, which would be suitable for limit states design with different materials and methods of construction. The current standard already contains a set of load combinations and probability factors for allowable stress design. This Executive Summary is presented to review briefly the conclusions of the main report, giving an overview of the recommendations and a concise rationale for their development. Objectives: 1) To recommend a methodology and set of load factors and corresponding load definitions for use in the A58 Standard which would be appropriate for all types of building materials (e.8., structural steel, reinforced and prestressed concrete, heavy timber, engineered masonry, cold-formed steel, aluminum) and, in the future, for building foundations; and 2) To provide a methodology for the various material specification groups to select resistance factors (0) consistent with these load factors and their own specific objectives. Rationale: Structural design is a complex process involving iterative cycles of analyzing the performance of idealized structures. Each analysis cycle involves the checking of subassemblies, * members, components and connections against various limit states defined in a structural specification dealing with the particular structural material. Typically this checking process involves satisfying a design criterion of the general form: Factored Resistance > Effect of factored loads. In the common case where the total load effect is a linear combination of individual loads, In this formula the left side reflects the resistance (capacity) of the structural element under consideration, and the right side denotes the forces which the element is expected to support during its intended life (load effects). The term R n is a nominal resistance corresponding to a limit state (e.g., maximum moment which can be carried by a cross section, buckling load, shear capacity), and is the "resistance factor," which is less than unity and which reflects the degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the resistance. The sum YQ is the product of the "load effect" Q (i.e., the force on the member or the element bending moment, shear force, torque, axial force or the stress on the component) due to the loading from different structural loads (e.g., dead load, live load due to occupancy, wind load, snow load, earthquake load) and a load factor Y, generally larger than unity, which accounts for the degree of uncertainty inherent in the determination of the forces Q. When nonlinearities in behavior are significant, the load factor should be applied before performing the structural analysis. In a more general sense or may represent a number of limit states (e.g., yielding n n and tensile strength in a metal tension member) for each element, and ? Yili reflects i=1 the largest of several load combinations. A substantial portion of this report is devoted Using as an example a metal tension member, and the tensile where 0 are the resistance factors for the yield limit state, F. у y' strength limit state, F. respectively, An is the net area, Dni In and W A |