« PreviousContinue »
FIGURE I. Reported measles cases
United States, Weeks 14–17, 1988
- NO REPORTD CASES Tho Morbidity and Mortality Woekly Report is prepared by the Conters for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, and available on a paid subscription basis from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, (202) 783-3238.
The data in this report are provisional, based on wookly reports to CDC by state health departments. The reporting wook concludes at close of business on Friday; compiled data on a national basis are officially roleased to the public on tho succeeding Friday. The editor welcomes accounts of interesting cases, outbreaks, environmental hazards, or other public health problems of current interest to health officials. Such reports and any other matters pertaining to editorial or other textual considerations should be addressed to: Editor, Morbidity and Mortality Wookly Roport, Contors for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Director, Centers for Disease Control
Editor James O. Mason, M.D., Dr.P.H.
Michael B. Gregg, M.D. Director, Epidemiology Program Office
Managing Editor Carl W. Tyler, Jr., M.D.
Gwendolyn A. Ingraham U.S. Government Printing Office: 1988-530-111/81501 Region IV
PUBLIC HEALTH TY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT
MAY 25 1999
FUBLIC HEALTH LIBRARY 1.37 No. 19 ologic Notes and Reports
Hepatitis A Among Drug Abusers c.2
to may 1988 %
Over the past several years, CDC has received an increasing number of reports of hepatitis A outbreaks involving drug abusers. These outbreaks have occurred in many areas of the United States, including Alaska, Oregon, Washington State, northern and southern California, Oklahoma, upstate New York, and Connecticut. A variety of drugs have been used: in Oregon, northern California, and Oklahoma, intravenous (IV) amphetamines have been most commonly implicated; in one locality in southern California, a new form of heroin, referred to as "black tar" because of its color and consistency, has been linked with transmission; in upstate New York, IV cocaine has been the primary drug. In several areas, cases have occurred among people who only smoked marijuana. Outbreaks in upstate New York and northern California and data from the Viral Hepatitis Surveillance Program (VHSP)* are summarized below to illustrate this trend. Upstate New York
Since December 1, 1986, hepatitis A outbreaks predominantly involving drug abusers have been reported in Monroe, Cortland, Onondaga, and Chemung counties in upstate New York. In Monroe County, 87 cases of physician-diagnosed hepatitis A were reported to local health authorities between December 1, 1986, and May 31, 1987. An average of nine cases had been reported for the same period of the previous 2 years. Twenty-four (28%) of these patients were IV drug abusers without other identifiable risk factors for hepatitis A. Eight additional patients were sexual or household contacts of these 24 patients. Information about the specific drugs used was not available for all patients; however, local drug enforcement officials believe that cocaine is the primary drug used intravenously in Monroe County.
Thirty-eight cases of hepatitis A occurred in Cortland County in 1987. Twenty-two (58%) of the patients were known or suspected drug abusers. Eleven of these cases occurred between March 25 and April 18. About 1 month before becoming ill, these 11 patients had attended two different social gatherings at which seven of them had used IV cocaine and shared needles. No food was consumed nor were beverages shared at these gatherings, and no other risk factors for hepatitis A could be identified. *A nationwide reporting system in which patients serologically confirmed to have hepatitis A are interviewed to identify probable sources of illness.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES / PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Hepatitis A - Continued
Increases in hepatitis A also occurred in Onondaga and Chemung Counties during 1987. Fifty (38%) of the 131 cases of hepatitis A in Onondaga County in 1987 were among known or suspected drug abusers; 70% of the 50 patients used only N cocaine. Thirteen cases occurred between October and December in Chemung County. Four (31%) of these patients were drug abusers; all used IV cocaine only. Anecdotal information suggested that drug abusers in Chemung County had recently obtained cocaine from persons in Onondaga County. Northern California
In June 1987, an outbreak of hepatitis A among patrons of a restaurant in a northern California county was reported to local health authorities. Investigation revealed that a restaurant cook with a history of IV drug abuse had been diagnosed with hepatitis A several weeks earlier. A review of all serologically confirmed cases of hepatitis A in the county between January 1 and June 30, 1987, was subsequently conducted. Thirty (42%) of the 71 cases identified were associated with the foodborne outbreak originating at the restaurant (Figure 1). Thirty-three of the remaining 41 patients were contacted either directly or through friends or family. Twenty-four (73%) of these 33 patients were IV drug abusers and did not have other risk factors for hepatitis A. Eleven (46%) of the IV drug abusers were male; all were white; and they ranged from 21 to 39 years of age. Twelve of the drug abusers admitted to IV drug use within 6 weeks before onset of hepatitis A. All twelve had injected "Crank" (an amphetamine derivative). Twelve of the IV drug abusers admitted to either casual or intimate contact or sharing needles or drug paraphernalia with at least one other IV drug abuser who contracted hepatitis A during the same period. Viral Hepatitis Surveillance Program
Data from VHSP indicate an increasing association between drug abuse and hepatitis A in the United States. Between 1982 and 1986, the percentage of persons with hepatitis A who admitted to previous IV drug use rose steadily from 4% to 19%. During this period, overall hepatitis A rates were relatively constant, and the proportion of patients with hepatitis A who had other identifiable risk factors remained stable. It should be noted, however, that only one-third of patients reported FIGURE 1. Cases of hepatitis A, by week of onset – northern California, 1987
Hepatitis A Continued to the MMWR Morbidity Surveillance System were interviewed through VHSP and that only a modest proportion of such persons are routinely asked about IV or other drug use. Reported by: SA Jenkerson, MSM, JP Middaugh, MD, State Epidemiologist, Alaska Dept of Health and Social Svcs. SL Pittman, RS Hill, MD, Napa County Health Dept, Napa; AG Redeker, MD, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, Los Angeles; RR Roberto, MD, California Dept of Health Svcs. JL Hadler, MD, MPH, State Epidemiologist, Connecticut State Dept of Health Svcs. KM Bell, MD, Monroe County Dept of Health, Rochester; J Miller, MD, MPH, Onondaga County Health Dept, Syracuse; J Feuss, Cortland County Health Dept, Cortland; C Benjamin, Chemung County Health Dept, Elmira; S Kondracki, M Toly, DL Morse, MD, MS, State Epidemiologist, New York State Dept of Health. B Gildon, GR Istre, MD, State Epidemiologist, Oklahoma State Dept of Health. J Polder, RN, MPH, LR Foster, MD, MPH, State Epidemiologist, Oregon Dept of Human Resources. JM Kobayashi, MD, State Epidemiologist, Washington Dept of Social and Health Svcs. Div of Field Svcs, Epidemiology Program Office; Hepatitis Br, Div of Viral Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. Editorial Note: In the United States, transmission of hepatitis A has traditionally been associated with crowding, poor personal hygiene, improper sanitation, and, less commonly, contamination of food or water. Recognized risk factors include intimate or close contact with persons with hepatitis A, foreign travel to developing countries, and contact with children in day-care centers.
The association of drug use and hepatitis A has been recognized only recently. Well-documented outbreaks of hepatitis A among drug abusers have been reported in Scandinavian countries (1,2). In seroprevalence studies of antibodies against hepatitis A virus (HAV) in Denmark, drug abusers have had antibody rates four times those of the general population (3).
Two possible explanations for the association between hepatitis A and drug use have been proposed: 1) HAV may be transmitted by injection or ingestion of contaminated drugs (common-source spread), or 2) transmission may result from direct person-to-person contact. The culture of fecal coliforms from marijuana confiscated during one investigation (Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, unpublished data) raises the possibility that direct contamination of drugs could be a factor in some of these outbreaks.' Drugs could become contaminated with fecal material containing HAV at the cultivation site (e.g., through use of human feces as fertilizer) or during transport, preparation, or distribution (e.g., through smuggling in condoms concealed in the rectum ( 4 ) or in baby diapers). However, the pattern of occurrence of the cases by dates of onset in each of the outbreaks and the diversity of drugs involved argue against a single common-source mode of transmission. Nevertheless, sustained common-source transmission is possible if contaminated drugs were distributed among persons who then used them at different times.
Person-to-person transmission of HAV between drug abusers could result from sharing needles, from sexual contact, or from generally poor sanitary and personal hygiene conditions, which have often been observed among drug abusers. Isolated instances of bloodborne transmission resulting from transfusions from donors who had given blood during the incubation period of viral infection have been reported. Due to the relatively short viremic phase of HAV infection, however, bloodborne By tasting the drug to assess quality, for example. 'HAV could not, however, be isolated from the marijuana by tissue culture (CDC, unpublished data).
Hepatitis A Continued transmission through needle-sharing is unlikely to have sustained large outbreaks such as those reported here, although it may have accounted for one cluster in Cortland County.
Investigations of the various outbreaks to date have not revealed clear modes of transmission. It is possible that each outbreak has multiple modes of transmission. Physicians and public health authorities are strongly urged to identify and investigate hepatitis outbreaks among drug abusers. Clinicians evaluating persons with a history of drug use for viral hepatitis should obtain serologic tests for both hepatitis A and B. Public health officials should ask persons with hepatitis A about drug use and include such information on the VHSP questionnaires. Control measures include the use of good sanitation and personal hygiene and the administration of immune globulin to contacts of patients within 2 weeks of exposure. Factors operating in communities of drug abusers, such as poor hygienic conditions and transience as well as the relatively poor responsiveness of such groups to education and preventive efforts, make outbreaks among these groups difficult to control.
(Continued on page 305) TABLE I. Summary cases of specified notifiable diseases, United States
19th Week Ending
Cumulative, 19th Week Ending
May 14, May 16, Median May 14, May 16, Median
1987 1983-1987 Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
168 11,185 6,791 2,463 Aseptic meningitis
1,371 1,683 1,524 Encephalitis: Primary (arthropod-borne & unspec)
37 Gonorrhea: Civilian
10,912 14,964 14,964 241,018 291,882 301,088 Military
364 4,499 6,358 7,538 Hepatitis: Type A
8,688 9,078 8,067 Type B
9,037 Non A, Non B
1,150 1,261 Unspecified
257 Measles: Totalt
108 1,029 1,784 1,237 Indigenous
923 1,564 1,100 Imported
137 Meningococcal infections
1,335 1,388 1,284 Mumps
2,111 7,423 1,529 Pertussis
654 Rubella (German measles)
187 Syphilis (Primary & Secondary): Civilian
489 13,566 12,164 10,279 Military
83 Toxic Shock syndrome
389 6,795 7,156 7,214 Tularemia
38 Typhoid Fever
109 Typhus fever, tick-borne (RMSF)
37 Rabies, animal
1,457 1,828 1,828
TABLE II. Notifiable diseases of low frequency, United States
Because AIDS cases are not received weekly from all reporting areas, comparison of weekly figures may be misleading. Eight of the 105 reported cases for this week were imported fiom a foreign country or can be directly traceable to a known internationally imported case within two generations.