Practitioners' Journal, Volume 42, Issue 4Association of Interstate Commerce Commission Practitioners., 1975 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandonment and consolidation Act's Administrative agency applicants approval Attorney at Law authorized Chairman Chapter Chicago Commission's Committee common carrier competition cost courts of appeals decision deposition District Division Doyle Report economic Federal filed FRAP freight cars freight operations Hobbs Act Ibid ICC's increase infra interrogatories Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission issue judicial review Louis-San Francisco Railway ment million annually Northern Lines officer Ohio P.O. Box Pacific party PCT's Penn Central Penn Central Transportation percent petition for review Premerger problems procedure proceeding proposed merger provides public interest rail mergers Rail Redevelopment Corporations rail service Railroad Company railroad mergers Railway Company Regional Rail regulations Reorganization request result roads Robert route rule savings Section served shippers Street Supp supra Supreme Court tariff tion Traffic Manager Traffic World transportation expense U.S. Supreme Court unification United USRA Vice President Washington Western witness York
Popular passages
Page 453 - Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter.
Page 458 - Objections to the competency of a witness or to the competency, relevancy, or materiality of testimony are not waived by failure to make them before or during the taking of the deposition, unless the ground of the objection is one which might have been obviated or removed if presented at that time.
Page 457 - At any time during the taking of the deposition, on motion of any party or of the deponent and upon a showing that the examination is being conducted in bad faith or in such manner as unreasonably to annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party...
Page 457 - ... that such exceptional circumstances exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses orally in open court, to allow the deposition to be used.
Page 456 - At the trial or upon the hearing of a motion or an interlocutory proceeding, any part or all of a deposition, so far as admissible under the rules of evidence...
Page 457 - The deposition of a witness, whether or not a party, may be used by any party for any purpose...
Page 453 - At a General Session of the Interstate Commerce Commission, held at its office in Washington, DC, on the 19th day of May AD 1914.
Page 458 - Any changes in form or substance which the witness desires to make shall be entered upon the deposition by the officer with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making them.
Page 414 - legal interest" test goes to the merits. The question of standing is different. It concerns, apart from the "case" or "controversy" test, the question whether the interest sought to be protected by the complainant is arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in question.
Page 459 - The interrogatories shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath. The answers shall be signed by the person making them ; and the party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers on the party submitting the interrogatories within 15 days after the service of the interrogatories unless the court, on motion and notice and for good cause shown, enlarges or shortens the time.