Arms Control by Committee: Managing Negotiations with the RussiansStanford University Press, 1992 - 349 pages This book is essentially a series of case histories of U.S.-Soviet nuclear arms control negotiations, as seen from the American side. It describes the processes of governmental decisionmaking for arms control in Washington, D.C., and the techniques for joint U.S.-Soviet decisionmaking at the negotiating table. As general counsel of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and member of U.S. delegations to disarmament conferences for eight years, the author was in a unique position to assess the difficulties of fashioning an arms control treaty that could pass muster within the executive branch of the U.S. government, be approved by U.S. allies, be successfully negotiated with the Soviets, and then win the approval of the U.S. Senate. This process will be even more complex now that the United States will face at least four nuclear powers from the former U.S.S.R. The book has three purposes. The first is to add to the recorded history of the following negotiations: the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, the Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968, the ABM Treaty of 1972 and its companion SALT Interim Agreements, and the 1987 INF Treaty. The author asks in each case, What did the president and his assistants do (or fail to do) to negotiate a successful agreement? The second purpose is to use the case book approach, common in law schools and business schools, as a teaching device for those who wish to learn how the American government made decisions about arms control negotiations, how U.S.-Soviet negotiators reached decisions, and what the results of the decisions have been. The book's third purpose is to generalize about what works and what does not work in the complex world of arms control negotiations, including information on the impact of negotiating committees and comparisons of the process for negotiating arms control treaties with that for achieving arms limits through action and reaction, without written agreement. The concluding chapter looks to the future: What changes will occur in the arms control process given the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union? |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
... interests or were working on similar research . I am grateful for the support of all of these institutions and for the help of many people who were a part of them . At Stanford , I participated twice in teaching an arms control - nego ...
... interests at the same time , or , when they have done so , to be able to seize the opportunity . This is not surprising , given the rivalry and distrust that have only recently melted away with the end of the Cold War . Another reason ...
... interests to search for mutually advantageous alternatives in accord with those inter- ests . " The positions of the two sides then can be better informed ( if not closer together ) than if they were developed by negotiating com ...
... interests and alterna- tives with the Soviet Union ? If an exploration has taken place but pro- duced no agreement in principle that the negotiating committees on both sides could approve , have presidents opened with tough , accom ...
... interests unless they thought we were going to catch up . Thus , the administration sought a general in- crease in the defense budget for strategic weapons before resuming ne- gotiations on them . There was no suggestion that all the ...
Contents
1 | |
18 | |
The Threshold Test Ban Treaty and Another | 49 |
The NPT Finally Brings Widespread International | 83 |
The ABM Treaty and an Opportunity | 106 |
SALT II Misses an Opportunity to Move | 132 |
The Decisionmaking | 168 |
The Negotiating Process | 200 |
Too Many Cooks? The Impact of the Negotiating | 214 |
Arms Control Without Agreements and | 235 |
Will the Process Change with the End | 255 |
Notes | 271 |
Sources | 315 |
Index | 335 |