LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Scanning electron micrograph (2400X, 30°) of demarcation- etched stress cracks. Sample as defined in figures 8 and
No cracks exist in overcoated oxide layer between aluminum patterns Scanning electron micrograph (4800X, 30°) showing a differ- ent area of sample from figure 10. Gray channel areas are caused by differences in charging due to etched-out alu- minum under glass
Glass microcracks in sample shown in figures 8, 10 and 11 as observed by SEM at 4800X and 30° from the perpendicular. Width of crack from this high-magnification photograph is approximately 0.2 μm.
Cross section SEM of a demarcation-etched structure. Sample consisted of a stress-cracked CVD PSG passivation layer over aluminum on oxidized silicon. Cavity formed in aluminum by selective etching underneath glass exhibits curved side walls caused by normal isotropic etching Optical photomicrographs of microcrack in a continuous 1.2-um-thick silicon dioxide film over aluminum-metallized linear bipolar IC wafer. Large light area is a metallized capacitor of 430 um length (150X, brightfield).
(a) - Untreated sample; fine microcracks are just barely visible.
Demarcation-etched in aluminum etch at 50°C by an etch time factor of 1.25; crack pattern over aluminum areas is now readily visible. Previously nondetect- able defects in smaller metal areas can now be seen. Additionally etched sample corresponding to an etch time factor of 2.5; cracks along the periphery of the metal areas have now become visible.
Etch time factor of 5.0; peripheral crack demarcations are seen to be 1/2 the width of the inside area bands, indicating that they occur exactly along edge of pattern. Portions of one interconnect line are seen to be the only undamaged parts in this sample area. Differences in the width of the inside demarcation bands in various areas seem to indicate differences in width of the crack, affecting the rate of demar- cation etching . .
Detailed optical photomicrographs of demarcation-etched glass cracks. (a)-same as figure 14 (c) but at 2.6X higher magnification. (b)-same as figure 14 (d) but at 2.6x higher magnification
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
16. Optical photomicrograph of pinholes in a PSG layer over aluminum as a function of increasing etch time factor: (a)-0; (b)-1.25; (c)-2.5, and (d)-5.0. It is seen that no new pinholes become demarcated beyond a factor of 1.25. Small size demarcations (indicating small pinholes) in- crease much more slowly in size on continued etching than longer ones, indicating that the rate of demarcation growth depends on the defect size, as noted for micro- cracks (385X, brightfield) . .
Developed partial pinholes in PSG passivation layer over aluminum interconnect pattern of an IC. These latent pinholes exposed the aluminum after 50% of the glass coat- ing was removed by selective etching (385X, bright field) Developed thin edge coverage of PSG over edges of aluminum interconnect of an IC. The aluminum line edges became ex- posed in many places after 50% of the glass coating was removed by selective etching (385X, brightfield) . . Schematic of electrophoretic decoration apparatus Photoresist mask showing negative/positive precision pat- tern used in defect decoration resolution measurements. Thinnest line is 1 μm (121X)
21. Micrograph of glass particles deposited on mesa-type wafer. The thermal oxide is 1.2 μm thick, and the groove width is 0.4 mm. (a) Deposition at 50 V for 8 min. (b) Deposition at 200 V for 2 min (20x)
Zinc oxide powder deposited by electrophoresis on thermal silicon dioxide showing pinhole decoration and background deposition. The deposition was done at 10 V for 30 s. The deposits decorating the pinholes are about 10 um in diameter (400X)
Micrograph of zinc silicate phosphor deposited on defect on IC wafer. Deposition was done at 25 V for 10 min. (100X, brightfield) .
Plot of current vs time for bare silicon wafer and silicon dioxide-covered wafer, for a suspension of lead alumino- silicate glass particles with petroleum barium sulfonate in C2C13F3. Also shown is the time dependence for bare silicon after the glass has settled out
25. Plot of charge transported vs applied voltage for silicon dioxide-coated wafer. The suspension is the same as for figure 24. Sulfonate content was 0.1% to C2C13F3 by volume for the points and 0.2% for the points
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Plot of glass deposited on silicon dioxide-coated wafers as function of concentration of petroleum barium sulfonate . Schematic of corona charging process.
Oxide surface voltage charged to saturation vs area of oxide-covered surface. Oxide thickness is 10,000 X
Oxide surface voltage charged to saturation vs oxide thick- ness for oxide-covered area of 1.7
Oxide surface voltage charged to saturation vs voltage of corona wires for oxide 10,000 & thick and area of 1.7 mm2 Oxide surface voltage charged to saturation vs distance from wafer to corona wires at 10 kV for oxide 10,000 Å thick and area of 1.7 mm
Oxide surface voltage decay in first minute after charging vs relative humidity
Direct decoration of defects after corona charging of insulator regions with ions of same sign as decorating particles in suspension .
(a) and (b)-Phosphor deposition at 10,000 V charging voltage showing excellent crack detection. Not all isolated phosphor deposits correspond to pinholes at this high voltage. (150X, uv and brightfield). (c)-Phosphor deposi- tion at relatively low charging voltage (6000 V). Note that cracks and large defects are detected by the phosphor (150x, and brightfield illumination). (d)-Sample from (c) after phosphor stripping followed by selective aluminum etching (15 min 50°C), (150X, brightfield) ..
(a)-Phosphor decoration at a charging potential of 6000 V prior to aluminum etching (150X, uv and brightfield illumination).
(b)-Sample from (a) after phosphor stripping followed by aluminum etching (5 min 80°C). The triangle encloses a defect detected by etching which had not been decorated by the phosphor
Corresponding photomicrographs of a glass-overcoated linear bipolar IC with stress-induced microcracks depicting two aluminum-metallized capacitor areas (a) and (b); (1) Samples before treatments, as seen under brightfield illumination (~100x). (2) Same samples electrophoretically decorated with ZnSi04:Mn phosphor B, as seen in uv and brightfield illumination (~100X). (3) Same sample after stripping phosphor followed by 5-min aluminum etching at 50°C (~100X) .
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
(a)-Electrophoretic phosphor decoration of negative/positive precision test pattern etched into 5000 A of thermally grown Si02 on silicon. Thinnest line width is 1 um (78.5X,
(b)-Same pattern as (a), showing feasibility of decorating "partial" pinholes or thin spots. In this case, 1000 X of CVD SiO2 was deposited over the same etched pattern used for (a) to simulate 1000-A-thick-thin spots over silicon. The pattern (except the narrowest line) has become decorat- ed, but with a lower quantity of phosphor
ZnSi04:Mn phosphor deposited along cracks in 15,000-A CVD Si02 layer over IC wafer exposed to humid ambient (RH = 62%) for 2 s between charging and deposition (150X, bright- field with uv irradiation)
Reverse decoration of defects after corona charging of in- sulator regions with ions of opposite sign to that of decorating particles in suspension . .
Carbon black deposited on device to reverse-decorate the defects. High contrast renders microscopic evaluation fast and sensitive. Width of narrowest aluminum lines (visible at right) is about 12 μm (150x) . . . . Confirmation of defect detection by the reverse-decoration method. Sample was aluminum-etched at 50°C for 5 min with- out removing carbon black. (a) 385X, (b) 760X ..
Carbon black deposition with high threshold voltage in (a) compared to one with low threshold voltage in (b); (150X, brightfield).
Carbon black reverse-decoration as function of time delay between charging and deposition. The time delays are
(a) 4 s, (b) 10 s, (c) 120 s. Corona potential was +7000 V dc (78.5X, bright field) .
Schematic of microscope use for obtaining image of source field stop at photocell for reflected light measurements . . Selectively demarcation-etched area pinholes in a defective passivation test layer over an aluminum-metallized IC (760X) . . .
Selectively demarcation-etched edge pinholes in a defective passivation test layer over an aluminum-metallized IC. Particulates are surface impurities left from plastic de- capsulation processing (385X)
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Variety of selectively demarcation-etched area and edge pinholes in a rf plasma-deposited silicon nitride pas- sivation layer over an aluminum-metallized IC (385X) Variety of selectively demarcation-etched area and edge pinholes in a rf plasma-deposited silicon nitride passivation layer over a gold-metallized IC (150X) Sequentially metal/glass-etched aluminum-metallized and glass-passivated IC showing numerous pinholes that were opened on glass etching (150X)
Density of open and partial pinholes as a function of glass composition and layer depth. Samples used were ex- perimental aluminum-metallized IC overcoated with 1.15-um CVD Si02 or PSG. The residual layer thickness are 1.15, 0.86, 0.58, and 0.29 uμm
51. Carbon black deposited on CMOS SOS device wafer showing defects in passivation layer (385X, bright field).
52. Example of cracking at edges of large aluminum areas due to extreme heat treatment. (a)-Cracks outlined by carbon black (150X, bright field), (b)-SEM cannot detect cracks (20,000x), (c)-After 10-s buffered hydrofluoric acid etching, the SEM does resolve the cracks (20,000X)
« PreviousContinue » |