Defense Acquisitions: Higher Level DOD Review of Antiarmor Mission and Munitions is Needed : Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, House of RepresentativesU.S. General Accounting Office, 2001 - 11 pages |
Common terms and phrases
2000 antiarmor master 2000 Defense Appropriations Air Force analyses aircraft sorties analysis specified antiarmor master plan Antiarmor Munitions Master antiarmor weapons acquisition Appropriations conference report APRIL 20 armored threat Army and Air attrition of U.S. Cold War critical to determining current capabilities data and analysis days of combat Defense Acquisitions Defense Appropriations Bill Defense Appropriations conference Defense official defense planning guidance Department of Defense describe how planned DOD's July Draft Report effectiveness and establishing Enemy kills evaluate the joint existing antiarmor weapons Fiscal Year 2000 forthcoming Quadrennial Defense impact of individual individual service joint effectiveness analysis July 2000 Antiarmor meet shortfalls Munitions Master Plan munitions mix official in charge planned antiarmor procurements planned antiarmor weapons planned new antiarmor planned procurements priorities for antiarmor Procurement Cost provide the data Quadrennial Defense Review Secretary of Defense shortfalls in current support the services U.S. forces Washington weapons acquisition programs weapons could meet Wiggins
Popular passages
Page 8 - OT&E remained separate and apart from the office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology).
Page 2 - Specifically, the plan did not include a joint effectiveness analysis, describe how planned antiarmor weapons could meet shortfalls in current capabilities, or provide a prioritization of antiarmor weapon needs and requirements.
Page 8 - DOD's 1999 antiarmor master plan also did not provide the data and analysis required by the report of the House Committee on Appropriations on the Fiscal Year 1999 Defense Appropriations Bill.