Greeks And BarbariansEdinburgh University Press, 2019 M07 30 - 288 pages How did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks. The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 19
Page 20
... Darius into a positive model of kingship ? " The play can also be usefully approached through comparison with ... Darius and Xerxes , see Saïd , ' Darius et Xerxes ' ; for my explanation in terms of the Chorus's failed emancipation ...
... Darius into a positive model of kingship ? " The play can also be usefully approached through comparison with ... Darius and Xerxes , see Saïd , ' Darius et Xerxes ' ; for my explanation in terms of the Chorus's failed emancipation ...
Page 32
... Darius , calling the Greeks who were at his court , asked them how much money they would take to eat their dead fathers . They said they wouldn't do it at any price . Darius then called some Indians , the so - called Callatiae , who eat ...
... Darius , calling the Greeks who were at his court , asked them how much money they would take to eat their dead fathers . They said they wouldn't do it at any price . Darius then called some Indians , the so - called Callatiae , who eat ...
Page 38
... Darius. Egypt is vulnerable only at one point, through the Arabian desert (3. 5. 1), yet once entered it is easily conquered. It has, so to speak, a hard shell, but is soft at the core. Once inside, however, Cambyses runs mad and kills ...
... Darius. Egypt is vulnerable only at one point, through the Arabian desert (3. 5. 1), yet once entered it is easily conquered. It has, so to speak, a hard shell, but is soft at the core. Once inside, however, Cambyses runs mad and kills ...
Page 41
... Darius on a new basis ; Persians were tra- ditionally taught before all else to tell the truth ( 1. 136. 2 ; cf. 138. 1 ) , but Darius is a partisan of the convenient lie ( 3. 72. 4 ) . Darius in his turn attacked the prototypical hard ...
... Darius on a new basis ; Persians were tra- ditionally taught before all else to tell the truth ( 1. 136. 2 ; cf. 138. 1 ) , but Darius is a partisan of the convenient lie ( 3. 72. 4 ) . Darius in his turn attacked the prototypical hard ...
Page 44
... Darius against the Scythians " ( 7.18 . 2 ) . But even Artabanus has to give in ; the expedition is evidently urged on by a higher power . Thus at Salamis and Plataea the Persian army met its destiny , and evolving national character ...
... Darius against the Scythians " ( 7.18 . 2 ) . But even Artabanus has to give in ; the expedition is evidently urged on by a higher power . Thus at Salamis and Plataea the Persian army met its destiny , and evolving national character ...
Contents
1 | |
15 | |
PART II THEMES | 125 |
PART III PEOPLES | 187 |
PART IV OVERVIEWS | 229 |
Intellectual Chronology | 311 |
Guide to Further Reading | 313 |
Bibliography | 314 |
Index | 328 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Achaemenid Aeschylus Agamemnon Amazons ancient Antiquity argument Aristotle Athenaeus Athenian Athens Attic Aulis Bacchae Bacchants Barbarian barbarism Bernal Byzantine Cadmus civilisation classical concept context contrast Ctesias cult customs Cyrus Darius dialect Dionysus Doric Egypt Egyptian emphasises empire Emptiness of Asia ethnic ethnographic Euripides example fact fifth century foreign gods Greece Greek cities Greek history Greek nation Greek world Greeks and Barbarians Harrison Hartog Hecataeus Hellas Hellenic Hellenistic Heracles hero Herodotus historian hoplite Ibid identity interpretation Inventing the Barbarian Iphigenia Isocrates king koine language linguistic Lissarrague Menelaus myth mythical nature Nippel nomoi nomos non-Greek Orestes oriental origin panhellenic Paris Pelasgians Persian Wars Phoenician Women Phrygian Plato polis political Pygmies religion Roman sacrifice Saïd Scythians slaves sources Spartan speak speech story Strabo Synodinou Thebes theme theory Thracian Thucydides tradition tragedy Trojan Xenophon Xerxes Zeus δὲ καὶ τῆς