Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]
[graphic][subsumed]
[blocks in formation]

Recent laws have enhanced the legislative requirements to provide
policymakers and agency program managers with more reliable financial
information to formulate budgets, manage government programs, and help
make difficult policy choices.1 Recognizing the extent of incomplete and
unreliable information on the cost and consequences of government
programs and activities, these laws have made implementing new
accounting standards and audited federal financial statements a priority.
New federal financial accounting standards have been adopted to enhance
federal financial statements by requiring that government agencies show
the financial results of their entire operations and provide relevant
information on their financial status. This report discusses one such
requirement for valuable information related to deferred maintenance on
mission assets.2 The second in a series of reports on the Department of
Defense's (DOD) implementation of this requirement, this report focuses on
Navy aircraft. We are not making recommendations in this report. Rather,
we are identifying specific issues that need to be considered in carrying
out the basic recommendation in our September 30, 1997, letter to
expedite plans to implement the deferred maintenance standard.

3

Accurate reporting of deferred maintenance is important for key decisionmakers, such as the Congress, DOD, and Navy managers. Further, deferred maintenance applicable to mission assets, if reliably quantified and reported, can be an important performance indicator of mission asset condition (a key readiness factor), as well as an indicator of the proper functioning of maintenance and supply lines. While the existence of

'The Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, the Government Management Reform Act of 1994, and the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996.

2Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standard No. 6, Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment, dated November 30, 1995, defines federal mission property, plant, and equipment as possessing certain characteristics related to (1) its use, such as having no expected nongovernmental uses, and (2) its useful life, such as a very high risk of being destroyed in use or premature obsolescence.

3See Financial Management: DOD Needs to Expedite Plans to Implement Deferred Maintenance Accounting Standard (GAO/AIMD-97-159R, September 30, 1997).

LIONARY U. OF I. URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

Background

deferred maintenance may indicate a need for additional resources for maintenance, such resources may already be available within the current funding of the military services.

In October 1990, the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board
(FASAB) was established by the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Comptroller General
of the United States to consider and recommend accounting standards to
address the financial and budgetary information needs of the Congress,
executive agencies, and other users of federal financial information. Using
a due process and consensus building approach, the nine-member Board,
which has since its formation included a member from DOD, recommends
accounting standards for the federal government. Once FASAB recommends
accounting standards, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of OMB,
and the Comptroller General decide whether to adopt the recommended
standards. If they are adopted, the standards are published as Statements
of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) by OMB and GAO. In
addition, the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996 as
well as the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act of 1982, require
federal agencies to implement and maintain financial management systems
that will permit the preparation of financial statements that substantially
comply with applicable federal accounting standards.

SFFAS No. 6, Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment, issued on
November 30, 1995, requires the disclosure of deferred maintenance in
agencies' financial statements for the fiscal year beginning October 1,
1997. SFFAS No. 6 defines deferred maintenance as "maintenance that was
not performed when it should have been or was scheduled to be and
which, therefore, is put off or delayed for a future period." It includes
preventive maintenance and normal repairs, but excludes modifications or
upgrades that are intended to expand the capacity of an asset. The
deferred maintenance standard applies to all property, plant, and
equipment, including mission assets-which will be reported on the
supplementary stewardship report.4 For DOD, mission assets, such as
submarines, ships, aircraft, and combat vehicles, is a major category of
property, plant, and equipment. In fiscal year 1996, DOD reported over
$590 billion in this asset category, of which over $297 billion belonged to
the Navy.

4SFFAS No. 8, Supplementary Stewardship Reporting, requires the reporting of federal mission property, plant, and equipment on the supplementary stewardship report for the fiscal years beginning October 1, 1997. Prior to this standard, these assets were reported on the Statement of Financial Position.

« PreviousContinue »